2004-08-12 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.cp / classes.exp
CommitLineData
40f235b7 1# Copyright 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002,
184ad485 2# 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
c906108c
SS
3
4# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
5# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
6# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
7# (at your option) any later version.
8#
9# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
10# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
11# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
12# GNU General Public License for more details.
13#
14# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
15# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
16# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
17
c906108c 18# This file was written by Fred Fish. (fnf@cygnus.com)
1cd3489f 19# And rewritten by Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>.
c906108c
SS
20
21set ws "\[\r\n\t \]+"
22set nl "\[\r\n\]+"
23
24if $tracelevel then {
1cd3489f 25 strace $tracelevel
c906108c
SS
26}
27
d4f3574e 28if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
c906108c 29
ed69573c 30set testfile "classes"
c906108c
SS
31set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
32set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
33
c906108c
SS
34if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
35 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
36}
37
c906108c
SS
38# Test ptype of class objects.
39#
1cd3489f
MC
40# This code accepts the output of gcc v2 and v3, dwarf-2 and stabs+.
41# It could use some expansion with other compilers such as hp-ux ac++.
42#
43# There are lots of variations in the output:
44#
2fc1f950
MC
45# . older gcc -gstabs+ emits debug info for implicit member functions:
46# operator=, copy ctor, ctor. newer gcc -gstabs+ sometimes emits
47# this debug info. gcc -gdwarf-2 also emits this debug info,
48# but gdb does not print implicit members in ptype output.
1cd3489f
MC
49#
50# . gcc with abi version 1 puts the implicit member functions
51# at the beginning of the member function list; with abi version 2,
52# the implicit member functions are at the end of the member function
53# list. This appears as an output difference with -gstabs+.
54# gcc 3.3.X defaults to abi version 1, and gcc 3.4 will default
55# to abi version 2.
56#
57# . gcc v2 shows data members for virtual base pointers.
58# gcc v3 does not.
59#
2fc1f950
MC
60# . ptype can print either "class ... { public:" or "struct ... {".
61# this depends on the debug info format; on whether the struct/class
62# has any c++ features such as non-public data members, base classes,
63# or member functions; and on other factors. I accept any form that
64# is semantically the same as the original.
c906108c
SS
65
66proc test_ptype_class_objects {} {
67 global gdb_prompt
68 global ws
69 global nl
70
1cd3489f 71 # Simple type.
c906108c 72
2fc1f950
MC
73 set re_class "((struct|class) default_public_struct \{${ws}public:|struct default_public_struct \{)"
74
1cd3489f 75 gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct default_public_struct" "ptype struct default_public_struct" {
2fc1f950 76 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
77 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
78 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
79 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
80 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
81 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
82 pass "ptype struct default_public_struct"
83 }
2fc1f950 84 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}default_public_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(default_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}default_public_struct\\(default_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}default_public_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
85 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
86 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 87 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 88 pass "ptype struct default_public_struct"
c906108c 89 }
c906108c
SS
90 }
91
1cd3489f 92 # Same test, slightly different type.
c906108c 93
2fc1f950
MC
94 set re_class "((struct|class) explicit_public_struct \{${ws}public:|struct explicit_public_struct \{)"
95
1cd3489f 96 gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct explicit_public_struct" "ptype struct explicit_public_struct" {
2fc1f950 97 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
98 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
99 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
100 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
101 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
102 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
103 pass "ptype struct explicit_public_struct"
104 }
2fc1f950 105 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}explicit_public_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(explicit_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_public_struct\\(explicit_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_public_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
106 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
107 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 108 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 109 pass "ptype struct explicit_public_struct"
c906108c 110 }
c906108c
SS
111 }
112
1cd3489f 113 # Same test, slightly different type.
c906108c 114
2fc1f950
MC
115 set re_class "((struct|class) protected_struct \{${ws}protected:)"
116
1cd3489f 117 gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct protected_struct" "ptype struct protected_struct" {
2fc1f950 118 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
119 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
120 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
121 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
122 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
123 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
f683e100 124 pass "ptype struct protected_struct"
c906108c 125 }
2fc1f950 126 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}protected_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(protected_struct const ?&\\);${ws}protected_struct\\(protected_struct const ?&\\);${ws}protected_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
127 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
128 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 129 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 130 pass "ptype struct protected_struct"
c906108c 131 }
c906108c
SS
132 }
133
1cd3489f 134 # Same test, slightly different type.
c906108c 135
2fc1f950
MC
136 set re_class "((struct|class) private_struct \{${ws}private:|class private_struct \{)"
137
1cd3489f 138 gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct private_struct" "ptype struct private_struct" {
2fc1f950 139 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
140 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
141 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
142 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
143 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
144 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
f683e100 145 pass "ptype struct private_struct"
c906108c 146 }
2fc1f950 147 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}private_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(private_struct const ?&\\);${ws}private_struct\\(private_struct const ?&\\);${ws}private_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
148 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
149 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 150 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 151 pass "ptype struct private_struct"
c906108c 152 }
c906108c
SS
153 }
154
1cd3489f 155 # Similar test, bigger type.
c906108c 156
2fc1f950
MC
157 set re_class "((struct|class) mixed_protection_struct \{${ws}public:|struct mixed_protection_struct \{)"
158
1cd3489f 159 gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct" "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct" {
2fc1f950 160 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
161 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
162 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
163 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
164 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
165 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
f683e100 166 pass "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct"
c906108c 167 }
2fc1f950 168 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;${ws}public:${ws}mixed_protection_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(mixed_protection_struct const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_struct\\(mixed_protection_struct const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
169 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
170 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 171 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 172 pass "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct"
c906108c 173 }
c906108c
SS
174 }
175
1cd3489f
MC
176 # All that again with "class" instead of "struct".
177 # gdb does not care about the difference anyways.
c906108c 178
2fc1f950
MC
179 set re_class "((struct|class) public_class \{${ws}public:|struct public_class \{)"
180
1cd3489f 181 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class public_class" "ptype class public_class" {
2fc1f950 182 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
183 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
184 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
185 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
186 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
187 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
f683e100 188 pass "ptype class public_class"
c906108c 189 }
2fc1f950 190 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(public_class const ?&\\);${ws}public_class\\(public_class const ?&\\);${ws}public_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
191 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
192 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 193 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
8a151ee0 194 pass "ptype class public_class"
c906108c 195 }
c906108c
SS
196 }
197
1cd3489f
MC
198 # Same test, slightly different type.
199
2fc1f950
MC
200 set re_class "((struct|class) protected_class \{${ws}protected:)"
201
1cd3489f 202 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class protected_class" "ptype class protected_class" {
2fc1f950 203 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
204 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
205 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
206 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
207 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
208 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
209 pass "ptype class protected_class"
210 }
2fc1f950 211 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}protected_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(protected_class const ?&\\);${ws}protected_class\\(protected_class const ?&\\);${ws}protected_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
212 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
213 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 214 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 215 pass "ptype class protected_class"
c906108c 216 }
c906108c
SS
217 }
218
1cd3489f 219 # Same test, slightly different type.
2fc1f950
MC
220
221 set re_class "((struct|class) default_private_class \{${ws}private:|class default_private_class \{)"
c906108c 222
1cd3489f 223 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class default_private_class" "ptype class default_private_class" {
2fc1f950 224 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
225 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
226 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
227 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
228 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
229 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
f683e100 230 pass "ptype class default_private_class"
c906108c 231 }
2fc1f950 232 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}default_private_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(default_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}default_private_class\\(default_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}default_private_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
233 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
234 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 235 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
f683e100 236 pass "ptype class default_private_class"
c906108c 237 }
c906108c
SS
238 }
239
1cd3489f
MC
240 # Same test, slightly different type.
241
2fc1f950
MC
242 set re_class "((struct|class) explicit_private_class \{${ws}private:|class explicit_private_class \{)"
243
1cd3489f 244 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class explicit_private_class" "ptype class explicit_private_class" {
2fc1f950 245 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
246 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
247 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
248 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
249 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
250 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
251 pass "ptype class explicit_private_class"
252 }
2fc1f950 253 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}explicit_private_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(explicit_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_private_class\\(explicit_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_private_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
254 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
255 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 256 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 257 pass "ptype class explicit_private_class"
c906108c 258 }
c906108c
SS
259 }
260
1cd3489f
MC
261 # Similar test, bigger type.
262
2fc1f950
MC
263 set re_class "((struct|class) mixed_protection_class \{${ws}public:|struct mixed_protection_class \{)"
264
1cd3489f 265 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class mixed_protection_class" "ptype struct mixed_protection_class" {
2fc1f950 266 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
267 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
268 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
269 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
270 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
271 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
272 pass "ptype class mixed_protection_class"
273 }
2fc1f950 274 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;${ws}public:${ws}mixed_protection_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(mixed_protection_class const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_class\\(mixed_protection_class const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
275 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
276 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 277 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 278 pass "ptype class mixed_protection_class"
c906108c 279 }
c906108c
SS
280 }
281
1cd3489f
MC
282 # Here are some classes with inheritance.
283
284 # Base class.
285
2fc1f950
MC
286 set re_class "((struct|class) A \{${ws}public:|struct A \{)"
287
1cd3489f 288 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class A" "ptype class A" {
2fc1f950 289 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
290 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
291 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
292 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
293 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
294 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
295 pass "ptype class A"
296 }
2fc1f950 297 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int a;${ws}int x;${ws}A ?& ?operator ?=\\(A const ?&\\);${ws}A\\(A const ?&\\);${ws}A\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
298 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
299 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 300 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 301 pass "ptype class A"
c906108c
SS
302 }
303 }
304
1cd3489f
MC
305 # Derived class.
306
2fc1f950
MC
307 set re_class "((struct|class) B : public A \{${ws}public:|struct B : public A \{)"
308
1cd3489f 309 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class B" "ptype class B" {
2fc1f950 310 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int b;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
311 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
312 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
313 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
314 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
315 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
9939d2a8 316 pass "ptype class B"
c906108c 317 }
2fc1f950 318 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int b;${ws}int x;${ws}B ?& ?operator ?=\\(B const ?&\\);${ws}B\\(B const ?&\\);${ws}B\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
319 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
320 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 321 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 322 pass "ptype class B"
c906108c
SS
323 }
324 }
325
1cd3489f
MC
326 # Derived class.
327
2fc1f950
MC
328 set re_class "((struct|class) C : public A \{${ws}public:|struct C : public A \{)"
329
1cd3489f 330 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class C" "ptype class C" {
2fc1f950 331 -re "${re_class}${ws}int c;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
332 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
333 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
334 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
335 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
336 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
9939d2a8 337 pass "ptype class C"
c906108c 338 }
2fc1f950 339 -re "${re_class}${ws}int c;${ws}int x;${ws}C ?& ?operator ?=\\(C const ?&\\);${ws}C\\(C const ?&\\);${ws}C\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
340 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
341 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 342 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 343 pass "ptype class C"
c906108c
SS
344 }
345 }
346
1cd3489f
MC
347 # Derived class, multiple inheritance.
348
2fc1f950
MC
349 set re_class "((struct|class) D : public B, public C \{${ws}public:|struct D : public B, public C \{)"
350
1cd3489f 351 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class D" "ptype class D" {
2fc1f950 352 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int d;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
353 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
354 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
355 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
356 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
357 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
9939d2a8 358 pass "ptype class D"
c906108c 359 }
2fc1f950 360 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int d;${ws}int x;${ws}D ?& ?operator ?=\\(D const ?&\\);${ws}D\\(D const ?&\\);${ws}D\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
361 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
362 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 363 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
1cd3489f 364 pass "ptype class D"
c906108c
SS
365 }
366 }
367
1cd3489f
MC
368 # Derived class.
369
2fc1f950
MC
370 set re_class "((struct|class) E : public D \{${ws}public:|struct E : public D \{)"
371
1cd3489f 372 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class E" "ptype class E" {
2fc1f950 373 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int e;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
374 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
375 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
376 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
377 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
378 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
379 pass "ptype class E"
380 }
2fc1f950 381 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int e;${ws}int x;${ws}E ?& ?operator ?=\\(E const ?&\\);${ws}E\\(E const ?&\\);${ws}E\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
382 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
383 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 384 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
385 pass "ptype class E"
386 }
c906108c
SS
387 }
388
1cd3489f
MC
389 # This is a break from inheritance tests.
390 #
391 # gcc 2.X with stabs (stabs or stabs+?) used to have a problem with
392 # static methods whose name is the same as their argument mangling.
393
2fc1f950
MC
394 set re_class "((struct|class) Static \{${ws}public:|struct Static \{)"
395
1cd3489f 396 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Static" "ptype class Static" {
2fc1f950 397 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
398 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
399 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
400 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
401 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
402 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
af890c52
DJ
403 pass "ptype class Static"
404 }
2fc1f950 405 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}Static ?& ?operator ?=\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\((void|)\\);${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
406 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
407 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
3e36a0f4
DJ
408 pass "ptype class Static"
409 }
2fc1f950
MC
410 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);${ws}Static ?& ?operator ?=\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
411 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
8f25f06b 412 pass "ptype class Static"
af890c52
DJ
413 }
414 }
415
1cd3489f
MC
416 # Here are some virtual inheritance tests.
417
2fc1f950
MC
418 set re_class "((struct|class) vA \{${ws}public:|struct vA \{)"
419
1cd3489f 420 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vA" "ptype class vA" {
2fc1f950 421 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int va;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
422 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
423 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
424 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
425 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
426 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
3e36a0f4
DJ
427 pass "ptype class vA"
428 }
2fc1f950 429 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}int va;${ws}int vx;${ws}vA ?& ?operator ?=\\(vA const ?&\\);${ws}vA\\(vA const ?&\\);${ws}vA\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
430 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
431 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950 432 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
c906108c
SS
433 pass "ptype class vA"
434 }
c906108c
SS
435 }
436
184ad485 437 # With gcc 2, gdb prints the virtual base pointer.
1cd3489f 438 # With gcc 3, gdb does not print the virtual base pointer.
184ad485 439 # drow considers it a gdb bug if gdb prints the vbptr.
c906108c 440
2fc1f950
MC
441 set re_class_private "((struct|class) vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:|class vB : public virtual vA \{)"
442 set re_class_public "((struct|class) vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:|struct vB : public virtual vA \{)"
443
1cd3489f 444 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vB" "ptype class vB" {
2fc1f950 445 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.2vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 446 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
184ad485
MC
447 # TODO: kfail this
448 fail "ptype class vB"
5178b9d6 449 }
2fc1f950
MC
450 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
451 # gcc 3.3.4 -gdwarf-2
452 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
453 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
1cd3489f 454 pass "ptype class vB"
c906108c 455 }
2fc1f950 456 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;${ws}vB ?& ?operator ?=\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(int, ?vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
457 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
458 # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
184ad485
MC
459 # TODO: kfail this
460 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
461 fail "ptype class vB (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
c906108c 462 }
2fc1f950
MC
463 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;${ws}vB ?& ?operator ?=\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
464 # gcc 3.3.4 -gstabs+
465 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
466 pass "ptype class vB"
467 }
468 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;${ws}vB\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
469 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
1cd3489f 470 pass "ptype class vB"
c906108c
SS
471 }
472 }
473
1cd3489f 474 # Another class with a virtual base.
c906108c 475
2fc1f950
MC
476 set re_class_private "((struct|class) vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:|class vC : public virtual vA \{)"
477 set re_class_public "((struct|class) vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:|struct vC : public virtual vA \{)"
478
1cd3489f 479 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vC" "ptype class vC" {
2fc1f950 480 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.2vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 481 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950 482 # TODO: kfail this
184ad485 483 fail "ptype class vC"
5178b9d6 484 }
2fc1f950
MC
485 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
486 # gcc 3.3.4 -gdwarf-2
487 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
488 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
1cd3489f 489 pass "ptype class vC"
c906108c 490 }
2fc1f950 491 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;${ws}vC ?& ?operator ?=\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(int, ?vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
492 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
493 # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
2fc1f950 494 # TODO: kfail this
184ad485
MC
495 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
496 fail "ptype class vC (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
c906108c 497 }
2fc1f950
MC
498 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;${ws}vC ?& ?operator ?=\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
499 # gcc 3.3.4 -gstabs+
500 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
501 pass "ptype class vC"
502 }
503 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;${ws}vC\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
504 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
1cd3489f 505 pass "ptype class vC"
c906108c
SS
506 }
507 }
508
1cd3489f 509 # The classic diamond inheritance.
c906108c 510
2fc1f950
MC
511 set re_class_private "((struct|class) vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}private:|class vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{)"
512 set re_class_public "((struct|class) vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}public:|struct vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{)"
513
1cd3489f 514 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vD" "ptype class vD" {
2fc1f950 515 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vC ?\\* ?_vb.2vC;${ws}vB ?\\* ?_vb.2vB;${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 516 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
184ad485
MC
517 # TODO: kfail
518 fail "ptype class vD"
5178b9d6 519 }
2fc1f950 520 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 521 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
522 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
523 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
1cd3489f 524 pass "ptype class vD"
c906108c 525 }
2fc1f950 526 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vC ?\\* ?_vb.vC;${ws}vB ?\\* ?_vb.vB;${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;${ws}vD ?& ?operator ?=\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(int, ?vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
527 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
528 # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
184ad485
MC
529 # TODO: kfail
530 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
531 fail "ptype class vD (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
c906108c 532 }
2fc1f950 533 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;${ws}vD ?& ?operator ?=\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 534 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950
MC
535 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
536 pass "ptype class vD"
537 }
538 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;${ws}vD\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
539 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
1cd3489f 540 pass "ptype class vD"
c906108c
SS
541 }
542 }
543
1cd3489f 544 # One more case of virtual derivation.
c906108c 545
2fc1f950
MC
546 set re_class_private "((struct|class) vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}private:|class vE : public virtual vD \{)"
547 set re_class_public "((struct|class) vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}public:|struct vE : public virtual vD \{)"
548
1cd3489f 549 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vE" "ptype class vE" {
2fc1f950 550 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vD ?\\* ?_vb.2vD;${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 551 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
184ad485
MC
552 # TODO: kfail
553 fail "ptype class vE"
5178b9d6 554 }
2fc1f950 555 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 556 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
2fc1f950
MC
557 # gcc 3.4.1 -gdwarf-2
558 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gdwarf-2
1cd3489f 559 pass "ptype class vE"
c906108c 560 }
2fc1f950 561 -re "type = ${re_class_private}${ws}vD ?\\* ?_vb.vD;${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;${ws}vE ?& ?operator ?=\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(int, ?vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
562 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
563 # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
184ad485
MC
564 # TODO: kfail
565 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
566 fail "ptype class vE (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
c906108c 567 }
2fc1f950 568 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;${ws}vE ?& ?operator ?=\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 569 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
2fc1f950
MC
570 # gcc 3.4.1 -gstabs+
571 pass "ptype class vE"
572 }
573 -re "type = ${re_class_public}${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;${ws}vE\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
574 # gcc HEAD 2004-07-31 00:45:52 UTC -gstabs+
1cd3489f 575 pass "ptype class vE"
c906108c
SS
576 }
577 }
578
1cd3489f
MC
579 # Another inheritance series.
580
581 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Base1" "ptype class Base1" {
582 -re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
583 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
584 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
585 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
c906108c
SS
586 pass "ptype class Base1"
587 }
1cd3489f
MC
588 -re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1 ?& ?operator ?=\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
589 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
590 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
3e36a0f4
DJ
591 pass "ptype class Base1"
592 }
1cd3489f
MC
593 -re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1\\(int\\);${ws}Base1 ?& ?operator ?=\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(Base1 const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
594 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
8f25f06b 595 pass "ptype class Base1"
c906108c
SS
596 }
597 }
598
1cd3489f
MC
599 # The second base class.
600
601 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Foo" "ptype class Foo" {
602 -re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
603 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
604 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
605 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
c906108c
SS
606 pass "ptype class Foo"
607 }
1cd3489f
MC
608 -re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}int operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
609 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
184ad485 610 # TODO: "int operator int()" is a bug
184ad485 611 # kfail "gdb/1497" "ptype class Foo"
9939d2a8 612 pass "ptype class Foo"
c906108c 613 }
1cd3489f
MC
614 -re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
615 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
616 pass "ptype class Foo"
c906108c 617 }
1cd3489f
MC
618 -re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
619 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
8f25f06b 620 pass "ptype class Foo"
c906108c
SS
621 }
622 }
623
1cd3489f
MC
624 # A multiple inheritance derived class.
625
626 gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Bar" "ptype class Bar" {
627 -re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
628 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
629 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
630 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
9939d2a8 631 pass "ptype class Bar"
c906108c 632 }
1cd3489f
MC
633 -re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar ?& ?operator ?=\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
634 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
635 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
636 pass "ptype class Bar"
c906108c 637 }
1cd3489f
MC
638 -re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);${ws}Bar ?& ?operator ?=\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(Bar const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
639 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
8f25f06b 640 pass "ptype class Bar"
c906108c
SS
641 }
642 }
643}
644
c906108c 645# Test simple access to class members.
1cd3489f
MC
646# TODO: these test names are gross!
647# Just let the test name default.
c906108c
SS
648
649proc test_non_inherited_member_access {} {
650 global gdb_prompt
651
652 # Print non-inherited members of g_A.
c906108c 653 gdb_test "print g_A.a" ".* = 1" "g_A.a incorrect"
c906108c
SS
654 gdb_test "print g_A.x" ".* = 2" "g_A.x incorrect"
655
656 # Print non-inherited members of g_B.
c906108c 657 gdb_test "print g_B.b" ".* = 5" "g_B.b incorrect"
c906108c
SS
658 gdb_test "print g_B.x" ".* = 6" "g_B.x incorrect"
659
660 # Print non-inherited members of g_C.
c906108c 661 gdb_test "print g_C.c" ".* = 9" "g_C.c incorrect"
c906108c
SS
662 gdb_test "print g_C.x" ".* = 10" "g_C.x incorrect"
663
664 # Print non-inherited members of g_D.
c906108c 665 gdb_test "print g_D.d" ".* = 19" "g_D.d incorrect"
c906108c
SS
666 gdb_test "print g_D.x" ".* = 20" "g_D.x incorrect"
667
668 # Print non-inherited members of g_E.
c906108c 669 gdb_test "print g_E.e" ".* = 31" "g_E.e incorrect"
c906108c
SS
670 gdb_test "print g_E.x" ".* = 32" "g_E.x incorrect"
671}
672
1cd3489f
MC
673# Test access to members of other classes.
674# gdb should refuse to print them.
675# (I feel old -- I remember when this was legal in C -- chastain).
676# TODO: Again, change the silly test names.
c906108c
SS
677
678proc test_wrong_class_members {} {
679 global gdb_prompt
680
681 gdb_test "print g_A.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b." "print g_A.b should be error"
c906108c 682 gdb_test "print g_B.c" "There is no member( or method|) named c." "print g_B.c should be error"
c906108c 683 gdb_test "print g_B.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d." "print g_B.d should be error"
c906108c 684 gdb_test "print g_C.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b." "print g_C.b should be error"
c906108c 685 gdb_test "print g_C.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d." "print g_C.d should be error"
c906108c
SS
686 gdb_test "print g_D.e" "There is no member( or method|) named e." "print g_D.e should be error"
687}
688
1cd3489f
MC
689# Test access to names that are not members of any class.
690# TODO: test names again.
c906108c 691
2bec0572 692proc test_nonexistent_members {} {
c906108c
SS
693 global gdb_prompt
694
695 gdb_test "print g_A.y" "There is no member( or method|) named y." "print g_A.y should be error"
c906108c 696 gdb_test "print g_B.z" "There is no member( or method|) named z." "print g_B.z should be error"
c906108c 697 gdb_test "print g_C.q" "There is no member( or method|) named q." "print g_C.q should be error"
c906108c
SS
698 gdb_test "print g_D.p" "There is no member( or method|) named p." "print g_D.p should be error"
699}
700
54602222
ND
701# Call a method that expects a base class parameter with base, inherited,
702# and unrelated class arguments.
54602222
ND
703
704proc test_method_param_class {} {
705 gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class param->a"
706 gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class param->x"
707 gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class param->a"
708 gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class param->x"
709 gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class (&param)->a"
710 gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class (&param)->x"
711 gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class (&param)->a"
712 gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class (&param)->x"
713 gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class param.a"
714 gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class param.x"
715 gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class param.a"
716 gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class param.x"
717
718 gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class *param"
719 gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class &param"
720 gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class param"
721}
722
2bec0572 723# Examine a class with an enum field.
2bec0572
ND
724
725proc test_enums {} {
726 global gdb_prompt
1cd3489f
MC
727 global nl
728 global ws
2bec0572
ND
729
730 # print the object
2bec0572 731
1cd3489f
MC
732 gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
733 "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = red, x = 0\}" \
734 "print obj_with_enum (1)"
735
736 # advance one line
737
738 gdb_test "next" ""
739
2bec0572 740 # print the object again
2bec0572 741
1cd3489f
MC
742 gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
743 "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = green, x = 0\}" \
744 "print obj_with_enum (2)"
745
746 # print the enum member
747
748 gdb_test "print obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = green"
2bec0572
ND
749
750 # ptype on the enum member
1cd3489f
MC
751
752 gdb_test_multiple "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" {
753 -re "type = enum ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
754 pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
755 }
756 -re "type = enum PrivEnum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
757 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
758 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
759 pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
760 }
761 -re "type = enum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
762 # This case case is a little dubious, but it's not clear what
763 # ought to be required of a ptype on a private enum...
764 # -sts 19990324
765 #
766 # It bugs me that this happens with gcc 3.
767 # -- chastain 2003-12-30
768 #
769 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
770 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
771 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
772 pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
773 }
2bec0572
ND
774 }
775
776 # ptype on the object
2fc1f950
MC
777
778 set re_class "((struct|class) ClassWithEnum \{${ws}public:|struct ClassWithEnum \{)"
779
1cd3489f 780 gdb_test_multiple "ptype obj_with_enum" "ptype obj_with_enum" {
2fc1f950 781 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}(enum |)ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
782 pass "ptype obj_with_enum"
783 }
2fc1f950 784 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}(enum |)PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
6ece72da
DC
785 # NOTE: carlton/2003-02-28: One could certainly argue that
786 # this output is acceptable: PrivEnum is a member of
787 # ClassWithEnum, so there's no need to explicitly qualify
788 # its name with "ClassWithEnum::". The truth, though, is
789 # that GDB is simply forgetting that PrivEnum is a member
790 # of ClassWithEnum, so we do that output for a bad reason
791 # instead of a good reason. Under stabs, we probably
792 # can't get this right; under DWARF-2, we can.
1cd3489f
MC
793 #
794 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
795 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
796 kfail "gdb/57" "ptype obj_with_enum"
797 }
2fc1f950 798 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}(enum |)PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;${ws}ClassWithEnum ?& ?operator ?=\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f 799 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
6ece72da
DC
800 kfail "gdb/57" "ptype obj_with_enum"
801 }
2fc1f950 802 -re "type = ${re_class}${ws}(enum |)ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;${ws}ClassWithEnum ?& ?operator ?=\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
1cd3489f
MC
803 # I think this is a PASS, but only carlton knows for sure.
804 # -- chastain 2003-12-30
805 #
806 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
807 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
184ad485 808 fail "ptype obj_with_enum"
1cd3489f 809 }
2bec0572
ND
810 }
811
1cd3489f 812 # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
23c73aa3 813 # See PR gdb/1588.
6ece72da 814
1cd3489f
MC
815 gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
816 -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
817 pass "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
d8a2d9e7 818 }
1cd3489f
MC
819 -re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
820 # "parse error" is bison 1.35.
821 # "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
23c73aa3 822 kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
d8a2d9e7 823 }
2bec0572 824 }
6ece72da 825
1cd3489f
MC
826 gdb_test_multiple "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" {
827 -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
828 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
829 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
830 pass "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
831 }
832 -re "No symbol \"ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum\" in current context.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
833 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
834 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
835 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
836 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
837 kfail "gdb/57" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
838 }
6ece72da 839 }
2bec0572
ND
840}
841
c906108c 842# Pointers to class members
c906108c
SS
843
844proc test_pointers_to_class_members {} {
845 global gdb_prompt
c906108c 846
1cd3489f
MC
847 gdb_test "print Bar::z" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\( ?Bar::& ?\\) ?\\) ?Bar::z"
848 gdb_test "print &Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\( ?Foo::\\* ?\\) ?\\) ?&Foo::x"
849 gdb_test "print (int)&Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 0"
850 gdb_test "print (int)&Bar::y == 2*sizeof(int)" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = true"
184ad485
MC
851
852 # TODO: this is a bogus test. It's looking at a variable that
853 # has not even been declared yet, so it's accessing random junk
854 # on the stack and comparing that it's NOT equal to a specific
855 # value. It's been like this since gdb 4.10 in 1993!
856 # -- chastain 2004-01-01
857 gdb_test "print (int)pmi == sizeof(int)" ".* = false"
c906108c
SS
858}
859
c906108c 860# Test static members.
c906108c
SS
861
862proc test_static_members {} {
863 global gdb_prompt
864 global hex
c906108c 865
1cd3489f 866 gdb_test "print Foo::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 100"
184ad485 867 gdb_test "set foo.st = 200" "" ""
1cd3489f
MC
868 gdb_test "print bar.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"
869 gdb_test "print &foo.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
870 gdb_test "print &Bar::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
871 gdb_test "print *\$" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"
c906108c
SS
872
873 gdb_test "set print static-members off" ""
874 gdb_test "print csi" \
875 "{x = 10, y = 20}" \
876 "print csi without static members"
877 gdb_test "print cnsi" \
878 "{x = 30, y = 40}" \
879 "print cnsi without static members"
880
881 gdb_test "set print static-members on" ""
c906108c
SS
882 gdb_test "print csi" \
883 "{x = 10, y = 20, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>}}" \
884 "print csi with static members"
c906108c
SS
885 gdb_test "print cnsi" \
886 "{x = 30, y = 40, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>, static yy = {z = 5, static xx = {x = 1, y = 2, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>, static yy = <same as static member of an already seen type>}}}, static yy = <same as static member of an already seen type>}" \
887 "print cnsi with static members"
888}
889
890proc do_tests {} {
891 global prms_id
892 global bug_id
893 global subdir
894 global objdir
895 global srcdir
896 global binfile
897 global gdb_prompt
1cd3489f 898 global nl
c906108c
SS
899
900 set prms_id 0
901 set bug_id 0
902
903 # Start with a fresh gdb.
904
905 gdb_exit
906 gdb_start
907 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
908 gdb_load $binfile
909
1cd3489f
MC
910 gdb_test "set language c++" "" ""
911 gdb_test "set width 0" "" ""
c906108c 912
1cd3489f
MC
913 if ![runto_main ] then {
914 perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
915 return
2bec0572
ND
916 }
917
1cd3489f
MC
918 gdb_breakpoint inheritance2
919 gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* inheritance2.*" ""
c906108c 920
1cd3489f
MC
921 test_ptype_class_objects
922 test_non_inherited_member_access
923 test_wrong_class_members
924 test_nonexistent_members
925 test_method_param_class
c906108c 926
1cd3489f 927 gdb_breakpoint enums2
184ad485 928 gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* enums2.*" "continue to enums2(\\(\\)|)"
1cd3489f
MC
929 gdb_test "finish" "" ""
930 test_enums
931
184ad485
MC
932 gdb_test "finish" "" ""
933 test_pointers_to_class_members
934 test_static_members
935
1cd3489f
MC
936 # Now some random tests that were just thrown in here.
937
938 gdb_breakpoint marker_reg1
939 gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* marker_reg1.*" ""
940 gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit from.*" "finish from marker_reg1"
941
942 # This class is so small that an instance of it can fit in a register.
943 # When gdb tries to call a method, it gets embarrassed about taking
944 # the address of a register.
945 #
946 # TODO: I think that message should be a PASS, not an XFAIL.
947 # gdb prints an informative message and declines to do something
948 # impossible.
949 #
950 # The method call actually succeeds if the compiler allocates very
951 # small classes in memory instead of registers. So this test does
952 # not tell us anything interesting if the call succeeds.
953 #
954 # -- chastain 2003-12-31
955 gdb_test_multiple "print v.method ()" "calling method for small class" {
956 -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 82$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
957 # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
958 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
959 # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
960 # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
961 pass "calling method for small class"
962 }
963 -re "Address requested for identifier \"v\" which is in register .*$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
964 # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
965 # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
966 setup_xfail "*-*-*" 2972
967 fail "calling method for small class"
c906108c
SS
968 }
969 }
184ad485
MC
970
971 # This is a random v2 demangling test.
972 # This is redundant with existing tests in demangle.exp.
973 # TODO: Just remove this.
974 gdb_test "maint demangle inheritance1__Fv" "inheritance1\\(void\\)" "demangle"
c906108c
SS
975}
976
977do_tests
This page took 0.691085 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.