gdb: Don't store a thread-id for floating varobj
authorAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:27:48 +0000 (11:27 +0100)
committerAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:47:28 +0000 (15:47 +0000)
commite707fc445e68ccfa136a52cd4989b0cb778d1ca7
treeb84a1d3be858bb6bccf2fc0260562568b5c6de2d
parent03d0bf7b78b142a5e03dfa1c80100893753d0022
gdb: Don't store a thread-id for floating varobj

When creating a varobj with -var-create a user can create either fixed
varobj, or floating varobj.

A fixed varobj will always be evaluated within the thread/frame/block in
which the varobj was created, if that thread/frame/block is no longer
available then the varobj is considered out of scope.

A floating varobj will always be evaluated within the current
thread/frame/block.

Despite never using them GDB was storing the thread/frame/block into a
floating varobj, and the thread-id would then be displayed when GDB
reported on the state of the varobj, this could confuse a user into
thinking that the thread-id was relevant.

This commit prevents GDB storing the thread/frame/block onto floating
varobj, and updates the few tests where this impacts the results.

gdb/ChangeLog:

* varobj.c (varobj_create): Don't set valid_block when creating a
floating varobj.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gdb.python/py-mi.exp: Don't expect a thread-id for floating
varobj.
* gdb.mi/mi-var-create-rtti.exp: Likewise.
gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-create-rtti.exp
gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-mi.exp
gdb/varobj.c
This page took 0.040573 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.