From: Philippe Proulx <eeppeliteloop@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 17:07:28 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: plugin-so.c: add comment about why we're not using a GLib linked list
X-Git-Tag: v2.0.1~8
X-Git-Url: http://git.efficios.com/?p=babeltrace.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=04ab8e4b0fc8da297defac90a763e4826c7d0bbf

plugin-so.c: add comment about why we're not using a GLib linked list

Signed-off-by: Philippe Proulx <eeppeliteloop@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I2e05156289d0d66a0a6ed9610d9d88a827a0b357
Reviewed-on: https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/2940
---

diff --git a/src/lib/plugin/plugin-so.c b/src/lib/plugin/plugin-so.c
index 3684acae..46a50630 100644
--- a/src/lib/plugin/plugin-so.c
+++ b/src/lib/plugin/plugin-so.c
@@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ BT_PLUGIN_MODULE();
  * component class is removed from this list, the shared library handle
  * object's reference count falls to zero and the shared library is
  * finally closed.
+ *
+ * We're not using a GLib linked list here because this destructor is
+ * called after GLib's thread-specific data is destroyed, which contains
+ * the allocated memory for GLib data structures (what's used by
+ * g_slice_alloc()).
  */
 
 static