cgroup: document cgroup_no_v1=
[deliverable/linux.git] / Documentation / cgroup-v2.txt
CommitLineData
6c292092
TH
1
2Control Group v2
3
4October, 2015 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
5
6This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
7conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
8of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
9future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
9a2ddda5 10v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
6c292092
TH
11
12CONTENTS
13
141. Introduction
15 1-1. Terminology
16 1-2. What is cgroup?
172. Basic Operations
18 2-1. Mounting
19 2-2. Organizing Processes
20 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
21 2-4. Controlling Controllers
22 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
23 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
24 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
25 2-5. Delegation
26 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
27 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
28 2-6. Guidelines
29 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
30 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
313. Resource Distribution Models
32 3-1. Weights
33 3-2. Limits
34 3-3. Protections
35 3-4. Allocations
364. Interface Files
37 4-1. Format
38 4-2. Conventions
39 4-3. Core Interface Files
405. Controllers
41 5-1. CPU
42 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
43 5-2. Memory
44 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
45 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
46 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
47 5-3. IO
48 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
49 5-3-2. Writeback
50P. Information on Kernel Programming
51 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
52D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
53R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
54 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
55 R-2. Thread Granularity
56 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
57 R-4. Other Interface Issues
58 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
59 R-5-1. Memory
60
61
621. Introduction
63
641-1. Terminology
65
66"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
67singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
68qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
69multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
70
71
721-2. What is cgroup?
73
74cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
75distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
76configurable manner.
77
78cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
79cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
80processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
81distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
82although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
83resource distribution.
84
85cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
86to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
87same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
88the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
89to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
90existing descendant processes.
91
92Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
93disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
94hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
95processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
96sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
97cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
98restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
99overridden from further away.
100
101
1022. Basic Operations
103
1042-1. Mounting
105
106Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
107hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command.
108
109 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
110
111cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
112controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
113automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
114Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
115bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
116legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
117
118A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
119is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
120controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
121have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
122the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
123Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
124the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
125controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
126to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
127disabled too.
128
129While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
130controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
131strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
132the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
133controllers after system boot.
134
1619b6d4
JW
135During transition to v2, system management software might still
136automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
137during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
138and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
139disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
140
6c292092
TH
141
1422-2. Organizing Processes
143
144Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
145A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory.
146
147 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
148
149A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
150structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
151"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
152belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
153same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
154another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
155
156A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
157target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
158on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
159threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
160process.
161
162When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
163cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
164operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
165that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
166zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
167moved to another cgroup.
168
169A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
170destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
171have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
172considered empty and can be removed.
173
174 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
175
176"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
177cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
178one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
179format "0::$PATH".
180
181 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
182 ...
183 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
184
185If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
186is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path.
187
188 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
189 ...
190 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
191
192
1932-3. [Un]populated Notification
194
195Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
196"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
197live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
198the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
199events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
200example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
201sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
202notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
203where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
204in each cgroup.
205
206 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
207 \ D(0)
208
209A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
210process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
211file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
212both cgroups.
213
214
2152-4. Controlling Controllers
216
2172-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
218
219Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
220controllers available for the cgroup to enable.
221
222 # cat cgroup.controllers
223 cpu io memory
224
225No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
226disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file.
227
228 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
229
230Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
231enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
232all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
233are specified, the last one is effective.
234
235Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
236the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
237Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
238listed in parentheses.
239
240 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
241 \ D()
242
243As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
244of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
245"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
246cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
247
248As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
249the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
250files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
251would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
252D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
253prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
254controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
255"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
256
257
2582-4-2. Top-down Constraint
259
260Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
261a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
262parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
263can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
264"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
265the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
266disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
267
268
2692-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
270
271Non-root cgroups can only distribute resources to their children when
272they don't have any processes of their own. In other words, only
273cgroups which don't contain any processes can have controllers enabled
274in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
275
276This guarantees that, when a controller is looking at the part of the
277hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on the
278leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete against
279internal processes of the parent.
280
281The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
282processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
283with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
284controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
285is up to each controller.
286
287Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
288enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
289important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
290populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
291cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
292children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
293file.
294
295
2962-5. Delegation
297
2982-5-1. Model of Delegation
299
300A cgroup can be delegated to a less privileged user by granting write
301access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs" file to the user. Note
302that resource control interface files in a given directory control the
303distribution of the parent's resources and thus must not be delegated
304along with the directory.
305
306Once delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
307organize processes as it sees fit and further distribute the resources
308it received from the parent. The limits and other settings of all
309resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what happens
310in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the resource
311restrictions imposed by the parent.
312
313Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
314cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
315this may be limited explicitly in the future.
316
317
3182-5-2. Delegation Containment
319
320A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
321can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee. For
322a process with a non-root euid to migrate a target process into a
323cgroup by writing its PID to the "cgroup.procs" file, the following
324conditions must be met.
325
326- The writer's euid must match either uid or suid of the target process.
327
328- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
329
330- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
331 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
332
333The above three constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
334processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
335in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
336
337For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
338user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
339all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0.
340
341 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
342 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
343 ~ hierarchy ~
344 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
345
346Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
347currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
348file and uid match on the process; however, the common ancestor of the
349source cgroup C10 and the destination cgroup C00 is above the points
350of delegation and U0 would not have write access to its "cgroup.procs"
351files and thus the write will be denied with -EACCES.
352
353
3542-6. Guidelines
355
3562-6-1. Organize Once and Control
357
358Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
359and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
360process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
361inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
362of synchronization cost.
363
364As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
365apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
366should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
367resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
368distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
369the interface files.
370
371
3722-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
373
374Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
375directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
376with interface files.
377
378All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
379controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
380a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
381'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
382character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
383start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
384such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
385
386cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
387user's responsibility to avoid them.
388
389
3903. Resource Distribution Models
391
392cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
393depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
394describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
395
396
3973-1. Weights
398
399A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
400active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
401weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
402resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
403work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
404used for stateless resources.
405
406All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
407allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
408enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
409
410As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
411valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
412process migrations.
413
414"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
415and is an example of this type.
416
417
4183-2. Limits
419
420A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
421Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
422exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
423
424Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
425
426As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
427valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
428process migrations.
429
430"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
431on an IO device and is an example of this type.
432
433
4343-3. Protections
435
436A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
437the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
438protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
439soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
440only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
441children.
442
443Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
444noop.
445
446As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
447are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
448process migrations.
449
450"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
451example of this type.
452
453
4543-4. Allocations
455
456A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
457resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
458allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
459available to the parent.
460
461Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
462resource.
463
464As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
465combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
466resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
467may be rejected.
468
469"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
470type.
471
472
4734. Interface Files
474
4754-1. Format
476
477All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
478possible.
479
480 New-line separated values
481 (when only one value can be written at once)
482
483 VAL0\n
484 VAL1\n
485 ...
486
487 Space separated values
488 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
489
490 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
491
492 Flat keyed
493
494 KEY0 VAL0\n
495 KEY1 VAL1\n
496 ...
497
498 Nested keyed
499
500 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
501 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
502 ...
503
504For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
505reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
506implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
507
508For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
509can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
510may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
511
512
5134-2. Conventions
514
515- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
516
517- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
518 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
519 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
520 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
521
522- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
523 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
524 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
525 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
526 intuitive (the default is 100%).
527
528- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
529 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
530 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
531 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
532 and "high" respectively.
533
534 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
535 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
536
537- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
538 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
539 appear as the first entry in the file.
540
541 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
542 "$VAL".
543
544 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
545 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
546 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
547
548 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
549 with integer values may look like the following.
550
551 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
552 default 150
553 8:0 300
554
555 The default value can be updated by
556
557 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
558
559 or
560
561 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
562
563 An override can be set by
564
565 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
566
567 and cleared by
568
569 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
570 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
571 default 125
572 8:16 170
573
574- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
575 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
576 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
577 generated on the file.
578
579
5804-3. Core Interface Files
581
582All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
583
584 cgroup.procs
585
586 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
587 all cgroups.
588
589 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
590 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
591 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
592 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
593 reading.
594
595 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
596 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
597 following conditions.
598
599 - Its euid is either root or must match either uid or suid of
600 the target process.
601
602 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
603
604 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
605 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
606
607 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
608 should be granted along with the containing directory.
609
610 cgroup.controllers
611
612 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
613 cgroups.
614
615 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
616 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
617
618 cgroup.subtree_control
619
620 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
621 cgroups. Starts out empty.
622
623 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
624 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
625 cgroup to its children.
626
627 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
628 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
629 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
630 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
631 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
632 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
633
634 cgroup.events
635
636 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
637 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
638 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
639 modified event.
640
641 populated
642
643 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
644 processes; otherwise, 0.
645
646
6475. Controllers
648
6495-1. CPU
650
651[NOTE: The interface for the cpu controller hasn't been merged yet]
652
653The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
654controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
655normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
656realtime scheduling policy.
657
658
6595-1-1. CPU Interface Files
660
661All time durations are in microseconds.
662
663 cpu.stat
664
665 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
666
667 It reports the following six stats.
668
669 usage_usec
670 user_usec
671 system_usec
672 nr_periods
673 nr_throttled
674 throttled_usec
675
676 cpu.weight
677
678 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
679 cgroups. The default is "100".
680
681 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
682
683 cpu.max
684
685 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
686 The default is "max 100000".
687
688 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format.
689
690 $MAX $PERIOD
691
692 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
693 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
694 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
695
696 cpu.rt.max
697
698 [NOTE: The semantics of this file is still under discussion and the
699 interface hasn't been merged yet]
700
701 A read-write two value file which exists on all cgroups.
702 The default is "0 100000".
703
704 The maximum realtime runtime allocation. Over-committing
705 configurations are disallowed and process migrations are
706 rejected if not enough bandwidth is available. It's in the
707 following format.
708
709 $MAX $PERIOD
710
711 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
712 $PERIOD duration. If only one number is written, $MAX is
713 updated.
714
715
7165-2. Memory
717
718The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
719stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
720intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
721stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
722complex.
723
724While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
725cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
726accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
727following types of memory usages are tracked.
728
729- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
730
731- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
732
733- TCP socket buffers.
734
735The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
736
737
7385-2-1. Memory Interface Files
739
740All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
741PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
742PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
743
744 memory.current
745
746 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
747 cgroups.
748
749 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
750 and its descendants.
751
752 memory.low
753
754 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
755 cgroups. The default is "0".
756
757 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a
758 cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries,
759 the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be
760 reclaimed from unprotected cgroups.
761
762 Putting more memory than generally available under this
763 protection is discouraged.
764
765 memory.high
766
767 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
768 cgroups. The default is "max".
769
770 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
771 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
772 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
773 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
774
775 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
776 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
777
778 memory.max
779
780 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
781 cgroups. The default is "max".
782
783 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
784 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
785 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
786 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
787 temporarily.
788
789 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
790 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
791 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
792
793 memory.events
794
795 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
796 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
797 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
798 modified event.
799
800 low
801
802 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
803 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
804 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
805 boundary is over-committed.
806
807 high
808
809 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
810 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
811 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
812 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
813 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
814 occurrences are expected.
815
816 max
817
818 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
819 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
820 fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked.
821
822 oom
823
824 The number of times the OOM killer has been invoked in
825 the cgroup. This may not exactly match the number of
826 processes killed but should generally be close.
827
587d9f72
JW
828 memory.stat
829
830 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
831
832 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
833 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
834 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
835
836 All memory amounts are in bytes.
837
838 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
839 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
840 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
841
842 anon
843
844 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
845 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
846
847 file
848
849 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
850 including tmpfs and shared memory.
851
852 file_mapped
853
854 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
855
856 file_dirty
857
858 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
859 not yet written back to disk
860
861 file_writeback
862
863 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
864 is currently being written back to disk
865
866 inactive_anon
867 active_anon
868 inactive_file
869 active_file
870 unevictable
871
872 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
873 on the internal memory management lists used by the
874 page reclaim algorithm
875
876 pgfault
877
878 Total number of page faults incurred
879
880 pgmajfault
881
882 Number of major page faults incurred
883
3e24b19d
VD
884 memory.swap.current
885
886 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
887 cgroups.
888
889 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
890 and its descendants.
891
892 memory.swap.max
893
894 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
895 cgroups. The default is "max".
896
897 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
898 limit, anonymous meomry of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
899
6c292092
TH
900
9015-2-2. General Usage
902
903"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
904Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
905and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
906usage is a viable strategy.
907
908Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
909throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
910opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
911more memory or terminating the workload.
912
913Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
914memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
915more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
916network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
917performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
918pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
919memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
920memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
921implemented yet.
922
923
9245-2-3. Memory Ownership
925
926A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
927charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
928to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
929instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
930
931A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
932To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
933over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
934enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
935
936If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
937to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
938POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
939belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
940
941
9425-3. IO
943
944The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
945controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
946limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
947only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
948blk-mq devices.
949
950
9515-3-1. IO Interface Files
952
953 io.stat
954
955 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
956 cgroups.
957
958 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
959 The following nested keys are defined.
960
961 rbytes Bytes read
962 wbytes Bytes written
963 rios Number of read IOs
964 wios Number of write IOs
965
966 An example read output follows.
967
968 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
969 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
970
971 io.weight
972
973 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
974 The default is "default 100".
975
976 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
977 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
978 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
979 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
980 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
981
982 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
983 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
984 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
985
986 An example read output follows.
987
988 default 100
989 8:16 200
990 8:0 50
991
992 io.max
993
994 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
995 cgroups.
996
997 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
998 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
999 defined.
1000
1001 rbps Max read bytes per second
1002 wbps Max write bytes per second
1003 riops Max read IO operations per second
1004 wiops Max write IO operations per second
1005
1006 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1007 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1008 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1009 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1010
1011 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1012 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1013
1014 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16.
1015
1016 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1017
1018 Reading returns the following.
1019
1020 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1021
1022 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following.
1023
1024 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1025
1026 Reading now returns the following.
1027
1028 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1029
1030
10315-3-2. Writeback
1032
1033Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1034written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1035mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1036regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1037write IOs.
1038
1039The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1040implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1041defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1042maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1043writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1044per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1045of the two is enforced.
1046
1047cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1048filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1049and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1050the root cgroup.
1051
1052There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1053which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1054page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1055inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1056from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1057
1058As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1059which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1060associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1061constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1062cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1063the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1064
1065While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1066mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1067changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1068inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1069significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1070As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1071doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1072strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1073areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1074patterns.
1075
1076The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1077writeback as follows.
1078
1079 vm.dirty_background_ratio
1080 vm.dirty_ratio
1081
1082 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1083 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1084 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1085
1086 vm.dirty_background_bytes
1087 vm.dirty_bytes
1088
1089 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1090 total available memory and applied the same way as
1091 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1092
1093
1094P. Information on Kernel Programming
1095
1096This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1097where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1098controllers are not covered.
1099
1100
1101P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
1102
1103A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1104address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1105following two functions.
1106
1107 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
1108
1109 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1110 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1111 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1112
1113 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
1114
1115 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1116 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1117 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1118 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1119
1120With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1121super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1122selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1123certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1124incompatible.
1125
1126wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1127the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1128the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1129entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1130for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1131cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1132directly.
1133
1134
1135D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
1136
1137- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1138
1139- All mount options and remounting are not supported.
1140
1141- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1142
1143- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1144
1145- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1146 at the root instead.
1147
1148
1149R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1150
1151R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
1152
1153cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1154hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1155provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1156
1157For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1158type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1159hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1160the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1161hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1162bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1163hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1164the specific controller.
1165
1166In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1167put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1168each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1169as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1170hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1171similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1172whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1173
1174Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1175It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1176the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1177used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1178
1179There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1180that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1181length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1182in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1183addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1184which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1185of hierarchies.
1186
1187Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1188topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1189controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1190completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1191least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1192
1193In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1194completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1195called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1196depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1197be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1198controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1199how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1200to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1201
1202
1203R-2. Thread Granularity
1204
1205cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1206This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1207ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1208much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1209individual applications and system management interface.
1210
1211Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1212itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1213categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1214the application which owns the target process.
1215
1216cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1217in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1218individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1219sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1220effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1221to lay programs.
1222
1223First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1224exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1225extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1226construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1227and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1228and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1229define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1230that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1231
1232cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1233accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1234system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1235knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1236revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1237individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1238effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1239without going through the required scrutiny.
1240
1241This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1242misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1243locked into constructs inadvertently.
1244
1245
1246R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
1247
1248cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
1249interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
1250children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
1251different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
1252settle it. Different controllers did different things.
1253
1254The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
1255mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
1256fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
1257cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
1258constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
1259There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
1260wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
1261simply weren't available for threads.
1262
1263The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
1264cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
1265the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
1266control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
1267always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
1268otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
1269implementation.
1270
1271The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
1272between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
1273clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
1274knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
1275led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
1276
1277Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
1278different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
1279severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
1280made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
1281
1282This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
1283in a uniform way.
1284
1285
1286R-4. Other Interface Issues
1287
1288cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
1289idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
1290was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
1291forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
1292recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
1293to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
1294the interface.
1295
1296Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
1297controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
1298all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
1299cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
1300implementation details to userland.
1301
1302There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
1303was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
1304restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
1305explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
1306control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
1307and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
1308formats and units even in the same controller.
1309
1310cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
1311controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
1312
1313
1314R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
1315
1316R-5-1. Memory
1317
1318The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
1319that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
1320global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
1321optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
1322implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
1323basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
1324hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
1325rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
1326in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
1327the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
1328introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
1329system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
1330becomes self-defeating.
1331
1332The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
1333reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
1334ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of
1335subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default
1336and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred
1337reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently
1338implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code,
1339without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes.
1340Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the
1341ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of
1342individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better
1343overall workload performance.
1344
1345The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
1346limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
1347But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
1348available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
1349runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
1350strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
1351working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
1352estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
1353OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
1354end up wasting precious resources.
1355
1356The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
1357conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
1358into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
1359OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
1360aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
1361lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
1362and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
1363gives acceptable performance is found.
1364
1365In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
1366breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
1367be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
1368allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
1369system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
1370limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
1371malicious applications.
3e24b19d
VD
1372
1373The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
1374control over swap space.
1375
1376The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
1377cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
1378able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
1379child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
1380groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
1381anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
1382swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
1383
1384For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
1385intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
1386that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
1387resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
1388and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.
This page took 0.077576 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.