Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1da177e4 LT |
1 | ============================= |
2 | NO-MMU MEMORY MAPPING SUPPORT | |
3 | ============================= | |
4 | ||
5 | The kernel has limited support for memory mapping under no-MMU conditions, such | |
6 | as are used in uClinux environments. From the userspace point of view, memory | |
7 | mapping is made use of in conjunction with the mmap() system call, the shmat() | |
8 | call and the execve() system call. From the kernel's point of view, execve() | |
9 | mapping is actually performed by the binfmt drivers, which call back into the | |
10 | mmap() routines to do the actual work. | |
11 | ||
12 | Memory mapping behaviour also involves the way fork(), vfork(), clone() and | |
13 | ptrace() work. Under uClinux there is no fork(), and clone() must be supplied | |
14 | the CLONE_VM flag. | |
15 | ||
16 | The behaviour is similar between the MMU and no-MMU cases, but not identical; | |
17 | and it's also much more restricted in the latter case: | |
18 | ||
19 | (*) Anonymous mapping, MAP_PRIVATE | |
20 | ||
21 | In the MMU case: VM regions backed by arbitrary pages; copy-on-write | |
22 | across fork. | |
23 | ||
24 | In the no-MMU case: VM regions backed by arbitrary contiguous runs of | |
25 | pages. | |
26 | ||
27 | (*) Anonymous mapping, MAP_SHARED | |
28 | ||
29 | These behave very much like private mappings, except that they're | |
30 | shared across fork() or clone() without CLONE_VM in the MMU case. Since | |
31 | the no-MMU case doesn't support these, behaviour is identical to | |
32 | MAP_PRIVATE there. | |
33 | ||
34 | (*) File, MAP_PRIVATE, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC, !PROT_WRITE | |
35 | ||
36 | In the MMU case: VM regions backed by pages read from file; changes to | |
37 | the underlying file are reflected in the mapping; copied across fork. | |
38 | ||
39 | In the no-MMU case: | |
40 | ||
41 | - If one exists, the kernel will re-use an existing mapping to the | |
42 | same segment of the same file if that has compatible permissions, | |
43 | even if this was created by another process. | |
44 | ||
45 | - If possible, the file mapping will be directly on the backing device | |
46 | if the backing device has the BDI_CAP_MAP_DIRECT capability and | |
47 | appropriate mapping protection capabilities. Ramfs, romfs, cramfs | |
48 | and mtd might all permit this. | |
49 | ||
50 | - If the backing device device can't or won't permit direct sharing, | |
51 | but does have the BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY capability, then a copy of the | |
52 | appropriate bit of the file will be read into a contiguous bit of | |
53 | memory and any extraneous space beyond the EOF will be cleared | |
54 | ||
55 | - Writes to the file do not affect the mapping; writes to the mapping | |
56 | are visible in other processes (no MMU protection), but should not | |
57 | happen. | |
58 | ||
59 | (*) File, MAP_PRIVATE, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC, PROT_WRITE | |
60 | ||
61 | In the MMU case: like the non-PROT_WRITE case, except that the pages in | |
62 | question get copied before the write actually happens. From that point | |
63 | on writes to the file underneath that page no longer get reflected into | |
64 | the mapping's backing pages. The page is then backed by swap instead. | |
65 | ||
66 | In the no-MMU case: works much like the non-PROT_WRITE case, except | |
67 | that a copy is always taken and never shared. | |
68 | ||
69 | (*) Regular file / blockdev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE | |
70 | ||
71 | In the MMU case: VM regions backed by pages read from file; changes to | |
72 | pages written back to file; writes to file reflected into pages backing | |
73 | mapping; shared across fork. | |
74 | ||
75 | In the no-MMU case: not supported. | |
76 | ||
77 | (*) Memory backed regular file, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE | |
78 | ||
79 | In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. | |
80 | ||
81 | In the no-MMU case: The filesystem providing the memory-backed file | |
82 | (such as ramfs or tmpfs) may choose to honour an open, truncate, mmap | |
83 | sequence by providing a contiguous sequence of pages to map. In that | |
84 | case, a shared-writable memory mapping will be possible. It will work | |
85 | as for the MMU case. If the filesystem does not provide any such | |
86 | support, then the mapping request will be denied. | |
87 | ||
88 | (*) Memory backed blockdev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE | |
89 | ||
90 | In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. | |
91 | ||
92 | In the no-MMU case: As for memory backed regular files, but the | |
93 | blockdev must be able to provide a contiguous run of pages without | |
94 | truncate being called. The ramdisk driver could do this if it allocated | |
95 | all its memory as a contiguous array upfront. | |
96 | ||
97 | (*) Memory backed chardev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE | |
98 | ||
99 | In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. | |
100 | ||
101 | In the no-MMU case: The character device driver may choose to honour | |
102 | the mmap() by providing direct access to the underlying device if it | |
103 | provides memory or quasi-memory that can be accessed directly. Examples | |
104 | of such are frame buffers and flash devices. If the driver does not | |
105 | provide any such support, then the mapping request will be denied. | |
106 | ||
107 | ||
108 | ============================ | |
109 | FURTHER NOTES ON NO-MMU MMAP | |
110 | ============================ | |
111 | ||
112 | (*) A request for a private mapping of less than a page in size may not return | |
113 | a page-aligned buffer. This is because the kernel calls kmalloc() to | |
114 | allocate the buffer, not get_free_page(). | |
115 | ||
116 | (*) A list of all the mappings on the system is visible through /proc/maps in | |
117 | no-MMU mode. | |
118 | ||
119 | (*) Supplying MAP_FIXED or a requesting a particular mapping address will | |
120 | result in an error. | |
121 | ||
122 | (*) Files mapped privately usually have to have a read method provided by the | |
123 | driver or filesystem so that the contents can be read into the memory | |
124 | allocated if mmap() chooses not to map the backing device directly. An | |
125 | error will result if they don't. This is most likely to be encountered | |
126 | with character device files, pipes, fifos and sockets. | |
127 | ||
128 | ============================================ | |
129 | PROVIDING SHAREABLE CHARACTER DEVICE SUPPORT | |
130 | ============================================ | |
131 | ||
132 | To provide shareable character device support, a driver must provide a | |
133 | file->f_op->get_unmapped_area() operation. The mmap() routines will call this | |
134 | to get a proposed address for the mapping. This may return an error if it | |
135 | doesn't wish to honour the mapping because it's too long, at a weird offset, | |
136 | under some unsupported combination of flags or whatever. | |
137 | ||
138 | The driver should also provide backing device information with capabilities set | |
139 | to indicate the permitted types of mapping on such devices. The default is | |
140 | assumed to be readable and writable, not executable, and only shareable | |
141 | directly (can't be copied). | |
142 | ||
143 | The file->f_op->mmap() operation will be called to actually inaugurate the | |
144 | mapping. It can be rejected at that point. Returning the ENOSYS error will | |
145 | cause the mapping to be copied instead if BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY is specified. | |
146 | ||
147 | The vm_ops->close() routine will be invoked when the last mapping on a chardev | |
148 | is removed. An existing mapping will be shared, partially or not, if possible | |
149 | without notifying the driver. | |
150 | ||
151 | It is permitted also for the file->f_op->get_unmapped_area() operation to | |
152 | return -ENOSYS. This will be taken to mean that this operation just doesn't | |
153 | want to handle it, despite the fact it's got an operation. For instance, it | |
154 | might try directing the call to a secondary driver which turns out not to | |
155 | implement it. Such is the case for the framebuffer driver which attempts to | |
156 | direct the call to the device-specific driver. Under such circumstances, the | |
157 | mapping request will be rejected if BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY is not specified, and a | |
158 | copy mapped otherwise. | |
159 | ||
160 | IMPORTANT NOTE: | |
161 | ||
162 | Some types of device may present a different appearance to anyone | |
163 | looking at them in certain modes. Flash chips can be like this; for | |
164 | instance if they're in programming or erase mode, you might see the | |
165 | status reflected in the mapping, instead of the data. | |
166 | ||
167 | In such a case, care must be taken lest userspace see a shared or a | |
168 | private mapping showing such information when the driver is busy | |
169 | controlling the device. Remember especially: private executable | |
170 | mappings may still be mapped directly off the device under some | |
171 | circumstances! | |
172 | ||
173 | ||
174 | ============================================== | |
175 | PROVIDING SHAREABLE MEMORY-BACKED FILE SUPPORT | |
176 | ============================================== | |
177 | ||
178 | Provision of shared mappings on memory backed files is similar to the provision | |
179 | of support for shared mapped character devices. The main difference is that the | |
180 | filesystem providing the service will probably allocate a contiguous collection | |
181 | of pages and permit mappings to be made on that. | |
182 | ||
183 | It is recommended that a truncate operation applied to such a file that | |
184 | increases the file size, if that file is empty, be taken as a request to gather | |
185 | enough pages to honour a mapping. This is required to support POSIX shared | |
186 | memory. | |
187 | ||
188 | Memory backed devices are indicated by the mapping's backing device info having | |
189 | the memory_backed flag set. | |
190 | ||
191 | ||
192 | ======================================== | |
193 | PROVIDING SHAREABLE BLOCK DEVICE SUPPORT | |
194 | ======================================== | |
195 | ||
196 | Provision of shared mappings on block device files is exactly the same as for | |
197 | character devices. If there isn't a real device underneath, then the driver | |
198 | should allocate sufficient contiguous memory to honour any supported mapping. |