Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
a6537be9 SR |
1 | RT-mutex subsystem with PI support |
2 | ---------------------------------- | |
3 | ||
4 | RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, | |
5 | which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes | |
6 | (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/pi-futex.txt for more details | |
7 | about PI-futexes.] | |
8 | ||
9 | This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for | |
10 | pthread_mutex support. | |
11 | ||
12 | Basic principles: | |
13 | ----------------- | |
14 | ||
15 | RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority | |
16 | inheritance protocol. | |
17 | ||
18 | A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher | |
19 | priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily | |
20 | boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority | |
21 | boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The | |
22 | priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been | |
23 | unlocked. | |
24 | ||
25 | This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on | |
26 | mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a | |
27 | magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows | |
28 | well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of | |
29 | an high priority thread, without losing determinism. | |
30 | ||
31 | The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter list is done in | |
32 | priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each | |
33 | rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's | |
34 | priority waiters list. This list too queues in priority order. Whenever | |
35 | the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or | |
36 | got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. [The | |
37 | priority enqueueing is handled by "plists", see include/linux/plist.h | |
38 | for more details.] | |
39 | ||
40 | RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal | |
41 | locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex | |
42 | without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg | |
43 | support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock | |
44 | is used] | |
45 | ||
46 | The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex | |
47 | structure: | |
48 | ||
49 | rt_mutex->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 and 1 | |
50 | are used to keep track of the "owner is pending" and "rtmutex has | |
51 | waiters" state. | |
52 | ||
53 | owner bit1 bit0 | |
54 | NULL 0 0 mutex is free (fast acquire possible) | |
55 | NULL 0 1 invalid state | |
56 | NULL 1 0 Transitional state* | |
57 | NULL 1 1 invalid state | |
58 | taskpointer 0 0 mutex is held (fast release possible) | |
59 | taskpointer 0 1 task is pending owner | |
60 | taskpointer 1 0 mutex is held and has waiters | |
61 | taskpointer 1 1 task is pending owner and mutex has waiters | |
62 | ||
63 | Pending-ownership handling is a performance optimization: | |
64 | pending-ownership is assigned to the first (highest priority) waiter of | |
65 | the mutex, when the mutex is released. The thread is woken up and once | |
66 | it starts executing it can acquire the mutex. Until the mutex is taken | |
67 | by it (bit 0 is cleared) a competing higher priority thread can "steal" | |
68 | the mutex which puts the woken up thread back on the waiters list. | |
69 | ||
70 | The pending-ownership optimization is especially important for the | |
71 | uninterrupted workflow of high-prio tasks which repeatedly | |
72 | takes/releases locks that have lower-prio waiters. Without this | |
73 | optimization the higher-prio thread would ping-pong to the lower-prio | |
74 | task [because at unlock time we always assign a new owner]. | |
75 | ||
76 | (*) The "mutex has waiters" bit gets set to take the lock. If the lock | |
77 | doesn't already have an owner, this bit is quickly cleared if there are | |
78 | no waiters. So this is a transitional state to synchronize with looking | |
79 | at the owner field of the mutex and the mutex owner releasing the lock. |