2011-07-26 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / structs.exp
CommitLineData
e53890ae
AC
1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
7b6bb8da 3# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011
9b254dd1 4# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
74cf1395
JM
5
6# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
e22f8b7c 8# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
74cf1395 9# (at your option) any later version.
e22f8b7c 10#
74cf1395
JM
11# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14# GNU General Public License for more details.
e22f8b7c 15#
74cf1395 16# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
e22f8b7c 17# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
74cf1395 18
74cf1395
JM
19if $tracelevel then {
20 strace $tracelevel
21}
22
74cf1395 23
e53890ae
AC
24# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
25# test.
26
27if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
28 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
29 fail "This target can not call functions"
30 continue
31}
32
74cf1395
JM
33set testfile "structs"
34set srcfile ${testfile}.c
35set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
36
8b7dbdc9
JK
37# Regex matching any value of `char' type like: a = 65 'A'
38set anychar_re {-?[0-9]{1,3} '(.|\\([0-7]{3}|[a-z]|\\|'))'}
39
e53890ae
AC
40# Create and source the file that provides information about the
41# compiler used to compile the test case.
853d6e5b 42
b4967060
AC
43if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
44 return -1;
853d6e5b
AC
45}
46
e53890ae
AC
47# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
48# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
49# the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
50# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
853d6e5b 51
8b7dbdc9 52set first 1
e53890ae
AC
53proc start_structs_test { types } {
54 global testfile
55 global srcfile
56 global binfile
57 global objdir
58 global subdir
59 global srcdir
60 global gdb_prompt
8b7dbdc9
JK
61 global anychar_re
62 global first
e53890ae
AC
63
64 # Create the additional flags
65 set flags "debug"
66 set testfile "structs"
67 set n 0
68 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
69 set m [I2A ${n}]
70 set t [lindex ${types} $n]
71 lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
72 append testfile "-" "$t"
73 }
74
75 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
76 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
77 # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
78 warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
79 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
80 untested structs.exp
81 return -1
e53890ae
AC
82 }
83 }
84
85 # Start with a fresh gdb.
e42c7771 86 gdb_exit
e53890ae
AC
87 gdb_start
88 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
89 gdb_load ${binfile}
90
91 # Make certain that the output is consistent
27d3a1a2
MS
92 gdb_test_no_output "set print sevenbit-strings"
93 gdb_test_no_output "set print address off"
94 gdb_test_no_output "set width 0"
95 gdb_test_no_output "set print elements 300"
e53890ae
AC
96
97 # Advance to main
98 if { ![runto_main] } then {
99 gdb_suppress_tests;
100 }
b729099e
MC
101
102 # Get the debug format
103 get_debug_format
e53890ae 104
8b7dbdc9
JK
105 # Limit the slow $anychar_re{256} matching for better performance.
106 if $first {
107 set first 0
108
109 # Verify $anychar_re can match all the values of `char' type.
110 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "chartest-done"]
111 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "chartest-done" ".*chartest-done.*"
112 gdb_test "p chartest" "= {({c = ${anychar_re}}, ){255}{c = ${anychar_re}}}"
113 }
114
e53890ae
AC
115 # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
116 set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
117 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
118 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
119 }
120 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
121 gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
122 "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
74cf1395
JM
123}
124
e53890ae
AC
125# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
126# empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
127# "zed" returns the invalid value.
853d6e5b 128
e53890ae
AC
129proc foo { n } {
130 return [lindex {
131 "{}"
132 "{a = 49 '1'}"
133 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
134 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
135 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
136 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
137 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
138 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
139 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
140 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
141 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
142 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
143 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
144 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
145 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
146 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
147 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
148 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
149 } $n]
150}
151
152proc zed { n } {
153 return [lindex {
154 "{}"
155 "{a = 90 'Z'}"
156 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
157 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
158 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
159 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
160 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
161 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
162 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
163 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
164 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
165 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
166 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
167 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
168 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
169 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
170 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
171 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
172 } $n]
173}
174
987a9106 175proc any { n } {
8b7dbdc9
JK
176 global anychar_re
177 set ac $anychar_re
178 return [lindex [list \
179 "{}" \
180 "{a = ${ac}}" \
181 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}}" \
182 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}}" \
183 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}}" \
184 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}}" \
185 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}}" \
186 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}}" \
187 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}}" \
188 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}}" \
189 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}}" \
190 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}}" \
191 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}}" \
192 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}}" \
193 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}}" \
194 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}}" \
195 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}}" \
196 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}, q = ${ac}}" \
197 ] $n]
987a9106
JB
198}
199
e53890ae
AC
200# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
201# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
202
203proc i2a { n } {
204 return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
205}
206
207proc I2A { n } {
208 return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
209}
210
211
212# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
213
e53890ae
AC
214proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
215 global testfile
216 if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
bbc8b958 217 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $bug $f }
e53890ae
AC
218 }
219}
220
221# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
222# returning (or passing in a single structs.
223
224# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
225# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
226# this test.
853d6e5b 227
e53890ae
AC
228# start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
229# specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
230# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
231
232# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
233# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
234
235proc test_struct_calls { n } {
236 global testfile
b4967060 237 global gdb_prompt
853d6e5b 238
e53890ae
AC
239 # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
240 # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
241 # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
242
243 # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
244 # examining the return value printed by GDB.
853d6e5b 245
e53890ae 246 set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
853d6e5b 247
e53890ae 248 # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
338e05af
AC
249 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
250 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 251 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
853d6e5b 252
e53890ae
AC
253 # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
254 # This test can never fail.
255
256 # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
257 # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
258 # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
259
27d3a1a2 260 gdb_test_no_output "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
338e05af
AC
261 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
262 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 263 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
b4967060 264}
853d6e5b 265
e53890ae
AC
266# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
267# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
268# return-value.
269
270# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
271# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
272# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
273# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
274# function and display the final source and line information.
275
276# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
277# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
278# this test.
279
280# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
281# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
282# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
283# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
284# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
285# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
286# other.
287
288proc test_struct_returns { n } {
289 global gdb_prompt
290 global testfile
291
292 set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
293
294
295 # Check that "return" works.
296
297 # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
298 # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
299 # possible to store the return value in a register.
300
301 # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
302 # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
7a9dd1b2 303 # snippet will store the returned value in "L{n}" the return
e53890ae
AC
304 # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
305 # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
306 # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
307 # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
308
309 # Get into a call of fun${n}
310 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
311 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
312 "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
313
314 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
1bfbbb9d 315 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
e53890ae
AC
316
317 # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
318 # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
319 # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
320 # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
321 # the frame ("No frame").
322
323 # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
324 # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
b5c0bfa2
AC
325 # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
326 # the return value was located.
e53890ae 327
e53890ae 328 set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 329 set return_value_known 1
5266b69c 330 set return_value_unimplemented 0
d422fe19 331 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
332 -re "The location" {
333 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 334 set return_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
335 exp_continue
336 }
337 -re "A structure or union" {
338 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 339 set return_value_known 0
5266b69c
AC
340 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
341 # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
342 set return_value_unimplemented 1
e53890ae
AC
343 exp_continue
344 }
345 -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
d422fe19 346 gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
347 -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
348 # Need to step off the function call
349 gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
350 }
351 -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
352 pass "${test}"
353 }
e53890ae
AC
354 }
355 }
e53890ae
AC
356 }
357
358 # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
359 # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
b5c0bfa2 360 # "return_value_known" set above.
987a9106
JB
361 #
362 # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
363 # assumptions at all about the value L<n>:
364 #
365 # - If the caller passed the address of L<n> directly as fun<n>'s
366 # return value buffer, then L<n> will be unchanged, because we
367 # forced fun<n> to return before it could store anything in it.
368 #
369 # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
370 # fun<n>, and then copied the buffer into L<n>, then L<n> will
371 # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
372 # uninitialized buffer.
373 #
374 # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
375 # "right" value of foo<n> in it, then L<n> will, in fact, have
376 # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
377 # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
378 #
379 # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
380 # true.
e53890ae 381
e53890ae 382 set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
d422fe19 383 gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae 384 -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
987a9106
JB
385 # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
386 # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
387 # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
388 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 389 }
987a9106 390 -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
391 if $return_value_known {
392 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
987a9106 393 # the location of the return value.
b5c0bfa2
AC
394 fail "${test}"
395 } else {
987a9106
JB
396 # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
397 # answer is acceptable.
e53890ae 398 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
399 }
400 }
5266b69c
AC
401 -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
402 if $return_value_unimplemented {
403 # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
404 # return_value, and hence has to fail.
405 kfail "$test" gdb/1444
406 } else {
407 fail "$test"
408 }
409 }
e53890ae
AC
410 }
411
412 # Check that a "finish" works.
413
414 # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
415 # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
416
417 # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
418 # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
419 # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
420 # "p/c", is checked.
421
422 # Get into "fun${n}()".
423 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
424 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
425 "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
426
427 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
e53890ae
AC
428 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
429
b5c0bfa2
AC
430 # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
431 # the return-value was found.
432
6882279b 433 set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 434 set finish_value_known 1
d422fe19 435 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
436 -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
437 pass "${test}"
438 }
439 -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
440 # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
b5c0bfa2 441 set finish_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
442 pass "${test}"
443 }
e53890ae
AC
444 }
445
446 # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
447 # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
448 # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
6882279b 449 set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
d422fe19 450 gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
e53890ae 451 -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
452 if $finish_value_known {
453 pass "${test}"
454 } else {
e53890ae
AC
455 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
456 # know the location of the return-value.
457 fail "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
458 }
459 }
460 -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
461 # The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
b5c0bfa2 462 if $finish_value_known {
e53890ae
AC
463 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
464 # know the location of the return-value.
465 fail "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
466 } else {
467 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
468 }
469 }
e53890ae
AC
470 }
471
472 # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
473 # behavior.
474
b5c0bfa2
AC
475 # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
476 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
477 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
478 # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
479 # reverse).
e53890ae 480
b5c0bfa2
AC
481 set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
482 if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
e53890ae 483 kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
484 } else {
485 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 486 }
b4967060 487}
853d6e5b 488
e53890ae
AC
489# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
490# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
491# possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
492# range of the other types.
493
494# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
495
496# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char
497# structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
498
499# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
500# original "structs" test was doing.
501
502start_structs_test { tc }
503test_struct_calls 1
504test_struct_calls 2
505test_struct_calls 3
506test_struct_calls 4
507test_struct_calls 5
508test_struct_calls 6
509test_struct_calls 7
510test_struct_calls 8
511test_struct_calls 9
512test_struct_calls 10
513test_struct_calls 11
514test_struct_calls 12
515test_struct_calls 13
516test_struct_calls 14
517test_struct_calls 15
518test_struct_calls 16
519test_struct_calls 17
520test_struct_returns 1
521test_struct_returns 2
522test_struct_returns 3
523test_struct_returns 4
524test_struct_returns 5
525test_struct_returns 6
526test_struct_returns 7
527test_struct_returns 8
528
529
530# Let the fun begin.
531
532# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
533# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
534# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
535# returns" test up to that boundary.
536
537# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
538# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
539
540# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
541# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
542# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
543# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
544# tl=8.
545
546# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
547start_structs_test { ts }
548test_struct_calls 1
549test_struct_calls 2
550test_struct_calls 3
551test_struct_calls 4
552test_struct_calls 5
553test_struct_returns 1
554test_struct_returns 2
555test_struct_returns 3
556test_struct_returns 4
557
558# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
559start_structs_test { ti }
560test_struct_calls 1
561test_struct_calls 2
562test_struct_calls 3
563test_struct_returns 1
564test_struct_returns 2
565
566# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
567start_structs_test { tl }
568test_struct_calls 1
569test_struct_calls 2
570test_struct_calls 3
571test_struct_returns 1
572test_struct_returns 2
573
574# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
575start_structs_test { tll }
576test_struct_calls 1
577test_struct_calls 2
578test_struct_returns 1
579
580# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
581start_structs_test { tf }
582test_struct_calls 1
583test_struct_calls 2
584test_struct_calls 3
585test_struct_returns 1
586test_struct_returns 2
587
588# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
589start_structs_test { td }
590test_struct_calls 1
591test_struct_calls 2
592test_struct_returns 1
593
594# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
595start_structs_test { tld }
596test_struct_calls 1
597test_struct_calls 2
598test_struct_returns 1
599
600# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
601start_structs_test { ts tc }
602test_struct_calls 2
603test_struct_calls 3
604test_struct_calls 4
605test_struct_calls 5
606test_struct_calls 6
607test_struct_calls 7
608test_struct_calls 8
609test_struct_returns 2
610
611# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
612start_structs_test { ti tc }
613test_struct_calls 2
614test_struct_calls 3
615test_struct_calls 4
616test_struct_calls 5
617test_struct_calls 6
618test_struct_returns 2
619
620# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
621start_structs_test { tl tc }
622test_struct_calls 2
623test_struct_calls 3
624test_struct_calls 4
625test_struct_calls 5
626test_struct_calls 6
627test_struct_returns 2
628
629# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
630start_structs_test { tll tc }
631test_struct_calls 2
632
633# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
634start_structs_test { tf tc }
635test_struct_calls 2
636test_struct_calls 3
637test_struct_calls 4
638test_struct_calls 5
639test_struct_calls 6
640test_struct_returns 2
641
642# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
643start_structs_test { td tc }
644test_struct_calls 2
645
646# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
647start_structs_test { tld tc }
648test_struct_calls 2
649
650# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
651start_structs_test { tc ts }
652test_struct_calls 2
653test_struct_calls 3
654test_struct_calls 4
655test_struct_calls 5
656test_struct_calls 6
657test_struct_returns 2
658
659# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
660start_structs_test { tc ti }
661test_struct_calls 2
662test_struct_calls 3
663test_struct_calls 4
664test_struct_returns 2
665
666# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
667start_structs_test { tc tl }
668test_struct_calls 2
669test_struct_calls 3
670test_struct_calls 4
671test_struct_returns 2
672
673# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
674start_structs_test { tc tll }
675test_struct_calls 2
676
677# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
678start_structs_test { tc tf }
679test_struct_calls 2
680test_struct_calls 3
681test_struct_calls 4
682
683# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
684start_structs_test { tc td }
685test_struct_calls 2
686
687# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
688start_structs_test { tc tld }
689test_struct_calls 2
690
691# Some float combinations
692
693# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
694# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
695start_structs_test { td tf }
696test_struct_calls 2
697test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395 698
e53890ae
AC
699# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
700# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
701start_structs_test { tf td }
702test_struct_calls 2
703test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395
JM
704
705return 0
This page took 1.357892 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.