Switch the license of all .exp files to GPLv3.
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / step-test.exp
1 # This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
3 # Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007
4 # Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5
6 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
8 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
9 # (at your option) any later version.
10 #
11 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14 # GNU General Public License for more details.
15 #
16 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
17 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
18 # step-test.exp -- Expect script to test stepping in gdb
19
20 if $tracelevel then {
21 strace $tracelevel
22 }
23
24 set testfile step-test
25 set srcfile ${testfile}.c
26 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
27
28 remote_exec build "rm -f ${binfile}"
29 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
30 untested step-test.exp
31 return -1
32 }
33
34 gdb_exit
35 gdb_start
36 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
37 gdb_load ${binfile}
38
39 if ![runto_main] then {
40 fail "Can't run to main"
41 return 0
42 }
43
44 # Set a breakpoint at line 45, if stepi then finish fails, we would
45 # run to the end of the program, which would mess up the rest of the tests.
46
47 # Vanilla step/next
48 #
49 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*x = 1;.*" "next 1"
50 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*y = 2;.*" "step 1"
51
52 # With count
53 #
54 gdb_test "next 2" ".*${decimal}.*w = w.*2;.*" "next 2"
55 gdb_test "step 3" ".*${decimal}.*z = z.*5;.*" "step 3"
56 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*OVER.*" "next 3"
57
58 # Step over call
59 #
60 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*" "next over"
61
62 # Step into call
63 #
64 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*" "step into"
65
66 # Step out of call
67 #
68 # I wonder if this is really portable. Are there any caller-saves
69 # platforms, on which `finish' will return you to some kind of pop
70 # instruction, which is attributed to the line containing the function
71 # call?
72
73 # On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32.
74 # On IA-64, we also end up on callee instead of on the next line due
75 # to the restoration of the global pointer (which is a caller-save).
76 # Similarly on MIPS PIC targets.
77 set test "step out"
78 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] || [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"]} {
79 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" {
80 -re ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*$gdb_prompt $" {
81 pass "$test"
82 }
83 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*$gdb_prompt $" {
84 pass "$test"
85 }
86 }
87 } else {
88 gdb_test "finish" ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*" "step out"
89 }
90
91 ### Testing nexti and stepi.
92 ###
93 ### test_i NAME COMMAND HERE THERE
94 ###
95 ### Send COMMAND to gdb over and over, while the output matches the
96 ### regexp HERE, followed by the gdb prompt. Pass if the output
97 ### eventually matches the regexp THERE, followed by the gdb prompt;
98 ### fail if we have to iterate more than a hundred times, we time out
99 ### talking to gdb, or we get output which is neither HERE nor THERE. :)
100 ###
101 ### Use NAME as the name of the test.
102 ###
103 ### The exact regexps used are "$HERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
104 ### and "$THERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
105 ###
106 proc test_i {name command here there} {
107 global gdb_prompt
108
109 set i 0
110 gdb_test_multiple "$command" "$name" {
111 -re "$here.*$gdb_prompt $" {
112 # Have we gone for too many steps without seeing any progress?
113 if {[incr i] >= 100} {
114 fail "$name (no progress after 100 steps)"
115 return
116 }
117 send_gdb "$command\n"
118 exp_continue
119 }
120 -re "$there.*$gdb_prompt $" {
121 # We've reached the next line. Rah.
122 pass "$name"
123 return
124 }
125 }
126 }
127
128 test_i "stepi to next line" "stepi" \
129 ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.* = a.*3" \
130 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI"
131 test_i "stepi into function" "stepi" \
132 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" \
133 ".*callee \\(\\) at .*step-test\\.c"
134
135 # Continue to step until we reach the function's body. This makes it
136 # more likely that we've actually completed the prologue, so "finish"
137 # will work.
138 test_i "stepi into function's first source line" "stepi" \
139 ".*${decimal}.*int callee" \
140 ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*; return 0;"
141
142 # Have to be careful here, if the finish does not work,
143 # then we may run to the end of the program, which
144 # will cause erroneous failures in the rest of the tests
145 set test "stepi: finish call"
146 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" {
147 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
148 pass "$test"
149 }
150 -re ".*(Program received|Program exited).*$gdb_prompt $" {
151 # Oops... We ran to the end of the program... Better reset
152 if {![runto_main]} then {
153 fail "$test (Can't run to main)"
154 return 0
155 }
156 if {![runto step-test.c:45]} {
157 fail "$test (Can't run to line 45)"
158 return 0
159 }
160 fail "$test"
161 }
162 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
163 # On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32.
164 # On IA-64, we end up on callee instead of on the following line due
165 # to the restoration of the global pointer.
166 # Similarly on MIPS PIC targets.
167 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] || [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"] } {
168 test_i "$test" "stepi" \
169 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI"
170 } else {
171 fail "$test"
172 }
173 }
174 }
175
176 test_i "nexti over function" "nexti" \
177 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI" \
178 ".*${decimal}.*y = w \\+ z;"
179
180 # On some platforms, if we try to step into a function call that
181 # passes a large structure by value, then we actually end up stepping
182 # into memcpy, bcopy, or some such --- GCC emits the call to pass the
183 # argument. Opinion is bitterly divided about whether this is the
184 # right behavior for GDB or not, but we'll catch it here, so folks
185 # won't forget about it.
186 # Update 4/4/2002 - Regardless of which opinion you have, you would
187 # probably have to agree that gdb is currently behaving as designed,
188 # in the absence of additional code to not stop in functions used
189 # internally by the compiler. Since the testsuite should be checking
190 # for conformance to the design, the correct behavior is to accept the
191 # cases where gdb stops in memcpy/bcopy.
192
193 gdb_test \
194 "break [gdb_get_line_number "step-test.exp: large struct by value"]" \
195 ".*Breakpoint.* at .*" \
196 "set breakpoint at call to large_struct_by_value"
197 gdb_test "continue" \
198 ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \
199 "run to pass large struct"
200 set test "large struct by value"
201 gdb_test_multiple "step" "$test" {
202 -re ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
203 pass "$test"
204 }
205 -re ".*(memcpy|bcopy).*$gdb_prompt $" {
206 send_gdb "finish\n" ; gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $"
207 send_gdb "step\n"
208 exp_continue
209 }
210 }
211
212 gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp"
213
214 return 0
This page took 0.040159 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.