+/* This function is called to create an indirect symbol from the
+ default for the symbol with the default version if needed. The
+ symbol is described by H, NAME, SYM, SEC, VALUE, and OVERRIDE. We
+ set DYNSYM if the new indirect symbol is dynamic. DT_NEEDED
+ indicates if it comes from a DT_NEEDED entry of a shared object. */
+
+static boolean
+elf_add_default_symbol (abfd, info, h, name, sym, sec, value,
+ dynsym, override, dt_needed)
+ bfd *abfd;
+ struct bfd_link_info *info;
+ struct elf_link_hash_entry *h;
+ const char *name;
+ Elf_Internal_Sym *sym;
+ asection **sec;
+ bfd_vma *value;
+ boolean *dynsym;
+ boolean override;
+ boolean dt_needed;
+{
+ boolean type_change_ok;
+ boolean size_change_ok;
+ char *shortname;
+ struct elf_link_hash_entry *hi;
+ struct elf_backend_data *bed;
+ boolean collect;
+ boolean dynamic;
+ char *p;
+
+ /* If this symbol has a version, and it is the default version, we
+ create an indirect symbol from the default name to the fully
+ decorated name. This will cause external references which do not
+ specify a version to be bound to this version of the symbol. */
+ p = strchr (name, ELF_VER_CHR);
+ if (p == NULL || p[1] != ELF_VER_CHR)
+ return true;
+
+ if (override)
+ {
+ /* We are overridden by an old defition. We need to check if we
+ need to crreate the indirect symbol from the default name. */
+ hi = elf_link_hash_lookup (elf_hash_table (info), name, true,
+ false, false);
+ BFD_ASSERT (hi != NULL);
+ if (hi == h)
+ return true;
+ while (hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect
+ || hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning)
+ {
+ hi = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) hi->root.u.i.link;
+ if (hi == h)
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ bed = get_elf_backend_data (abfd);
+ collect = bed->collect;
+ dynamic = (abfd->flags & DYNAMIC) != 0;
+
+ shortname = bfd_hash_allocate (&info->hash->table,
+ (size_t) (p - name + 1));
+ if (shortname == NULL)
+ return false;
+ strncpy (shortname, name, (size_t) (p - name));
+ shortname [p - name] = '\0';
+
+ /* We are going to create a new symbol. Merge it with any existing
+ symbol with this name. For the purposes of the merge, act as
+ though we were defining the symbol we just defined, although we
+ actually going to define an indirect symbol. */
+ type_change_ok = false;
+ size_change_ok = false;
+ if (! elf_merge_symbol (abfd, info, shortname, sym, sec, value,
+ &hi, &override, &type_change_ok,
+ &size_change_ok, dt_needed))
+ return false;
+
+ if (! override)
+ {
+ if (! (_bfd_generic_link_add_one_symbol
+ (info, abfd, shortname, BSF_INDIRECT, bfd_ind_section_ptr,
+ (bfd_vma) 0, name, false, collect,
+ (struct bfd_link_hash_entry **) &hi)))
+ return false;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* In this case the symbol named SHORTNAME is overriding the
+ indirect symbol we want to add. We were planning on making
+ SHORTNAME an indirect symbol referring to NAME. SHORTNAME
+ is the name without a version. NAME is the fully versioned
+ name, and it is the default version.
+
+ Overriding means that we already saw a definition for the
+ symbol SHORTNAME in a regular object, and it is overriding
+ the symbol defined in the dynamic object.
+
+ When this happens, we actually want to change NAME, the
+ symbol we just added, to refer to SHORTNAME. This will cause
+ references to NAME in the shared object to become references
+ to SHORTNAME in the regular object. This is what we expect
+ when we override a function in a shared object: that the
+ references in the shared object will be mapped to the
+ definition in the regular object. */
+
+ while (hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect
+ || hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning)
+ hi = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) hi->root.u.i.link;
+
+ h->root.type = bfd_link_hash_indirect;
+ h->root.u.i.link = (struct bfd_link_hash_entry *) hi;
+ if (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC)
+ {
+ h->elf_link_hash_flags &=~ ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC;
+ hi->elf_link_hash_flags |= ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_DYNAMIC;
+ if (hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & (ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_REGULAR
+ | ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR))
+ {
+ if (! _bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, hi))
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Now set HI to H, so that the following code will set the
+ other fields correctly. */
+ hi = h;
+ }
+
+ /* If there is a duplicate definition somewhere, then HI may not
+ point to an indirect symbol. We will have reported an error to
+ the user in that case. */
+
+ if (hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+ {
+ struct elf_link_hash_entry *ht;
+
+ /* If the symbol became indirect, then we assume that we have
+ not seen a definition before. */
+ BFD_ASSERT ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & (ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC
+ | ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR)) == 0);
+
+ ht = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) hi->root.u.i.link;
+ (*bed->elf_backend_copy_indirect_symbol) (ht, hi);
+
+ /* See if the new flags lead us to realize that the symbol must
+ be dynamic. */
+ if (! *dynsym)
+ {
+ if (! dynamic)
+ {
+ if (info->shared
+ || ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
+ *dynsym = true;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_REGULAR) != 0)
+ *dynsym = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* We also need to define an indirection from the nondefault version
+ of the symbol. */
+
+ shortname = bfd_hash_allocate (&info->hash->table, strlen (name));
+ if (shortname == NULL)
+ return false;
+ strncpy (shortname, name, (size_t) (p - name));
+ strcpy (shortname + (p - name), p + 1);
+
+ /* Once again, merge with any existing symbol. */
+ type_change_ok = false;
+ size_change_ok = false;
+ if (! elf_merge_symbol (abfd, info, shortname, sym, sec, value,
+ &hi, &override, &type_change_ok,
+ &size_change_ok, dt_needed))
+ return false;
+
+ if (override)
+ {
+ /* Here SHORTNAME is a versioned name, so we don't expect to see
+ the type of override we do in the case above. */
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%s: warning: unexpected redefinition of `%s'"),
+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), shortname);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (! (_bfd_generic_link_add_one_symbol
+ (info, abfd, shortname, BSF_INDIRECT,
+ bfd_ind_section_ptr, (bfd_vma) 0, name, false,
+ collect, (struct bfd_link_hash_entry **) &hi)))
+ return false;
+
+ /* If there is a duplicate definition somewhere, then HI may not
+ point to an indirect symbol. We will have reported an error
+ to the user in that case. */
+
+ if (hi->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+ {
+ /* If the symbol became indirect, then we assume that we have
+ not seen a definition before. */
+ BFD_ASSERT ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & (ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC
+ | ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR)) == 0);
+
+ (*bed->elf_backend_copy_indirect_symbol) (h, hi);
+
+ /* See if the new flags lead us to realize that the symbol
+ must be dynamic. */
+ if (! *dynsym)
+ {
+ if (! dynamic)
+ {
+ if (info->shared
+ || ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
+ *dynsym = true;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if ((hi->elf_link_hash_flags
+ & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_REGULAR) != 0)
+ *dynsym = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+