- }
- else if (strcmp (cs->c_name, _DATA) == 0)
- break;
- else if (strcmp (cs->c_name, _BSS) == 0)
- break;
-
- /* get rid of assembly labels here */
- /* record_misc_function (cs->c_name, cs->c_value); */
- break;
- }
- (void) process_coff_symbol (cs, &main_aux);
+ }
+ else if (!SDB_TYPE (cs->c_type)
+ && cs->c_name[0] == 'L'
+ && (strncmp (cs->c_name, "LI%", 3) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name, "LF%", 3) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LC%",3) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LP%",3) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LPB%",4) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LBB%",4) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LBE%",4) == 0
+ || strncmp (cs->c_name,"LPBX%",5) == 0))
+ /* At least on a 3b1, gcc generates swbeg and string labels
+ that look like this. Ignore them. */
+ break;
+ /* fall in for static symbols that don't start with '.' */
+ case C_EXT:
+ /* Record external symbols in minsyms if we don't have debug
+ info for them. FIXME, this is probably the wrong thing
+ to do. Why don't we record them even if we do have
+ debug symbol info? What really belongs in the minsyms
+ anyway? Fred!?? */
+ if (!SDB_TYPE (cs->c_type)) {
+ /* FIXME: This is BOGUS Will Robinson!
+ Coff should provide the SEC_CODE flag for executable sections,
+ then if we could look up sections by section number we
+ could see if the flags indicate SEC_CODE. If so, then
+ record this symbol as a function in the minimal symbol table.
+ But why are absolute syms recorded as functions, anyway? */
+ if (cs->c_secnum <= text_bfd_scnum+1) {/* text or abs */
+ record_minimal_symbol (cs->c_name, cs->c_value,
+ mst_text, objfile);
+ break;
+ } else {
+ record_minimal_symbol (cs->c_name, cs->c_value,
+ mst_data, objfile);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ process_coff_symbol (cs, &main_aux, objfile);