-static void
-restore_selected_frame (struct frame_id a_frame_id, int frame_level)
-{
- struct frame_info *frame = NULL;
- int count;
-
- /* This means there was no selected frame. */
- if (frame_level == -1)
- {
- select_frame (NULL);
- return;
- }
-
- gdb_assert (frame_level >= 0);
-
- /* Restore by level first, check if the frame id is the same as
- expected. If that fails, try restoring by frame id. If that
- fails, nothing to do, just warn the user. */
-
- count = frame_level;
- frame = find_relative_frame (get_current_frame (), &count);
- if (count == 0
- && frame != NULL
- /* The frame ids must match - either both valid or both outer_frame_id.
- The latter case is not failsafe, but since it's highly unlikely
- the search by level finds the wrong frame, it's 99.9(9)% of
- the time (for all practical purposes) safe. */
- && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (frame), a_frame_id))
- {
- /* Cool, all is fine. */
- select_frame (frame);
- return;
- }
-
- frame = frame_find_by_id (a_frame_id);
- if (frame != NULL)
- {
- /* Cool, refound it. */
- select_frame (frame);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Nothing else to do, the frame layout really changed. Select the
- innermost stack frame. */
- select_frame (get_current_frame ());
-
- /* Warn the user. */
- if (frame_level > 0 && !current_uiout->is_mi_like_p ())
- {
- warning (_("Couldn't restore frame #%d in "
- "current thread. Bottom (innermost) frame selected:"),
- frame_level);
- /* For MI, we should probably have a notification about
- current frame change. But this error is not very
- likely, so don't bother for now. */
- print_stack_frame (get_selected_frame (NULL), 1, SRC_AND_LOC, 1);
- }
-}