nios2: Don't check relocations in non-loaded, non-alloced sections

[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / bfd / TODO

diff --git a/bfd/TODO b/bfd/TODO
index 8d39107fdde3f4f6aa2080b1e47f7c92470ac4bb..63e38cf1052e71105a4df34fff100820664651b2 100644 (file)
--- a/bfd/TODO
+++ b/bfd/TODO
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Things that still need to be done: -*- Text -*-
 
- o - A source of space lossage is that all the target-dependent
-     code is in a single bfd_target structure.  Hence all the code
-     for *writing* object files is still pulled into all the applications
-     that only care about *reading* (gdb, nm, objdump), while gas
-     has to carry along all the unneded baggage for reading objects.
-     And so one.  This would be a much more substantial change,
-     and the payoff would be less (essentially none if bfd is
-     used as a shared library).
+ o - A source of space lossage is that all the target-dependent code
+     is in a single bfd_target structure.  Hence all the code for
+     *writing* object files is still pulled into all the applications
+     that only care about *reading* (gdb, nm, objdump), while gas has
+     to carry along all the unneeded baggage for reading objects.  And
+     so on.  This would be a substantial change, and the payoff would
+     not all that great (essentially none if bfd is used as a shared
+     library).
 
  o - The storage needed by BFD data structures is also larger than strictly
      needed.  This may be difficult to do much about.
@@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ Things that still need to be done: -*- Text -*-
      the stupid quips and fill in all the blanks.
 
  o - upgrade the reloc handling as per Steve's suggestion.
+\f
+Copyright (C) 2012-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
-
-
-
+Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
+are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
+notice and this notice are preserved.