is http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/ and patches should be sent to
binutils@sources.redhat.com with "[patch]" as part of the subject.
+Note - patches to the top level configure.in and config.sub scripts
+should be sent to config-patches@gnu.org and not to the binutils list.
+
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
ix86 Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
ix86 COFF,PE DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
ix86 H.J.Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
+ix86 INTEL MODE Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
MIPS Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@calypso.engr.sgi.com>
PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
SH Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
SPARC Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
68HC11 68HC12 Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr>
+DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
+x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just remember
to get approval before checking anything in.]
+
+ ------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
+
+Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
+right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
+The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
+you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
+spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
+also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
+small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
+some un-obvious side effect or consequence.