Fix the linker so that it will not silently generate ELF binaries with invalid progra...

[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / complaints.c

diff --git a/gdb/complaints.c b/gdb/complaints.c
index dbacb2ad1e430b8242c58d893a22efb7035e90b5..b35c81de342618c2561d6872b804f29a165a4f2b 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/complaints.c
+++ b/gdb/complaints.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Support for complaint handling during symbol reading in GDB.
 
-   Copyright (C) 1990-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Copyright (C) 1990-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
    This file is part of GDB.
 
@@ -27,18 +27,17 @@ extern void _initialize_complaints (void);
 /* Should each complaint message be self explanatory, or should we
    assume that a series of complaints is being produced?  */
 
-/* case 1: First message of a series that must
-   start off with explanation.  case 2: Subsequent message of a series
-   that needs no explanation (the user already knows we have a problem
-   so we can just state our piece).  */
 enum complaint_series {
   /* Isolated self explanatory message.  */
   ISOLATED_MESSAGE,
+
   /* First message of a series, includes an explanation.  */
   FIRST_MESSAGE,
+
   /* First message of a series, but does not need to include any sort
      of explanation.  */
   SHORT_FIRST_MESSAGE,
+
   /* Subsequent message of a series that needs no explanation (the
      user already knows we have a problem so we can just state our
      piece).  */
@@ -69,13 +68,7 @@ struct complaints
 {
   struct complain *root;
 
-  /* Should each complaint be self explanatory, or should we assume
-     that a series of complaints is being produced?  case 0: Isolated
-     self explanatory message.  case 1: First message of a series that
-     must start off with explanation.  case 2: Subsequent message of a
-     series that needs no explanation (the user already knows we have
-     a problem so we can just state our piece).  */
-  int series;
+  enum complaint_series series;
 
   /* The explanatory messages that should accompany the complaint.
      NOTE: cagney/2002-08-14: In a desperate attempt at being vaguely
@@ -99,7 +92,7 @@ static struct explanation symfile_explanations[] = {
 
 static struct complaints symfile_complaint_book = {
   &complaint_sentinel,
-  0,
+  ISOLATED_MESSAGE,
   symfile_explanations
 };
 struct complaints *symfile_complaints = &symfile_complaint_book;