(*val) = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE (regnum));
}
-void
-frame_read_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, void *buf)
-{
- gdb_assert (frame != NULL && frame->next != NULL);
- frame_unwind_register (frame->next, regnum, buf);
-}
-
-void
-frame_read_unsigned_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
- ULONGEST *val)
-{
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-10-31: There is a bit of dogma here - there is
- always a frame. Both this, and the equivalent
- frame_read_signed_register() function, can only be called with a
- valid frame. If, for some reason, this function is called
- without a frame then the problem isn't here, but rather in the
- caller. It should of first created a frame and then passed that
- in. */
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-10-31: As a side bar, keep in mind that the
- ``current_frame'' should not be treated as a special case. While
- ``get_next_frame (current_frame) == NULL'' currently holds, it
- should, as far as possible, not be relied upon. In the future,
- ``get_next_frame (current_frame)'' may instead simply return a
- normal frame object that simply always gets register values from
- the register cache. Consequently, frame code should try to avoid
- tests like ``if get_next_frame() == NULL'' and instead just rely
- on recursive frame calls (like the below code) when manipulating
- a frame chain. */
- gdb_assert (frame != NULL && frame->next != NULL);
- frame_unwind_unsigned_register (frame->next, regnum, val);
-}
-
-void
-frame_read_signed_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
- LONGEST *val)
-{
- /* See note above in frame_read_unsigned_register(). */
- gdb_assert (frame != NULL && frame->next != NULL);
- frame_unwind_signed_register (frame->next, regnum, val);
-}
-
void
put_frame_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, const void *buf)
{