}
}
-/* Resume execution of the inferior process.
- If STEP is nonzero, single-step it.
- If SIGNAL is nonzero, give it that signal. */
+/* Resume execution of LWP. If STEP is nonzero, single-step it. If
+ SIGNAL is nonzero, give it that signal. */
static void
-linux_resume_one_lwp (struct lwp_info *lwp,
- int step, int signal, siginfo_t *info)
+linux_resume_one_lwp_throw (struct lwp_info *lwp,
+ int step, int signal, siginfo_t *info)
{
struct thread_info *thread = get_lwp_thread (lwp);
struct thread_info *saved_thread;
regcache_invalidate_thread (thread);
errno = 0;
- lwp->stopped = 0;
- lwp->stop_reason = TARGET_STOPPED_BY_NO_REASON;
lwp->stepping = step;
ptrace (step ? PTRACE_SINGLESTEP : PTRACE_CONT, lwpid_of (thread),
(PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) 0,
current_thread = saved_thread;
if (errno)
+ perror_with_name ("resuming thread");
+
+ /* Successfully resumed. Clear state that no longer makes sense,
+ and mark the LWP as running. Must not do this before resuming
+ otherwise if that fails other code will be confused. E.g., we'd
+ later try to stop the LWP and hang forever waiting for a stop
+ status. Note that we must not throw after this is cleared,
+ otherwise handle_zombie_lwp_error would get confused. */
+ lwp->stopped = 0;
+ lwp->stop_reason = TARGET_STOPPED_BY_NO_REASON;
+}
+
+/* Called when we try to resume a stopped LWP and that errors out. If
+ the LWP is no longer in ptrace-stopped state (meaning it's zombie,
+ or about to become), discard the error, clear any pending status
+ the LWP may have, and return true (we'll collect the exit status
+ soon enough). Otherwise, return false. */
+
+static int
+check_ptrace_stopped_lwp_gone (struct lwp_info *lp)
+{
+ struct thread_info *thread = get_lwp_thread (lp);
+
+ /* If we get an error after resuming the LWP successfully, we'd
+ confuse !T state for the LWP being gone. */
+ gdb_assert (lp->stopped);
+
+ /* We can't just check whether the LWP is in 'Z (Zombie)' state,
+ because even if ptrace failed with ESRCH, the tracee may be "not
+ yet fully dead", but already refusing ptrace requests. In that
+ case the tracee has 'R (Running)' state for a little bit
+ (observed in Linux 3.18). See also the note on ESRCH in the
+ ptrace(2) man page. Instead, check whether the LWP has any state
+ other than ptrace-stopped. */
+
+ /* Don't assume anything if /proc/PID/status can't be read. */
+ if (linux_proc_pid_is_trace_stopped_nowarn (lwpid_of (thread)) == 0)
{
- /* ESRCH from ptrace either means that the thread was already
- running (an error) or that it is gone (a race condition). If
- it's gone, we will get a notification the next time we wait,
- so we can ignore the error. We could differentiate these
- two, but it's tricky without waiting; the thread still exists
- as a zombie, so sending it signal 0 would succeed. So just
- ignore ESRCH. */
- if (errno == ESRCH)
- return;
+ lp->stop_reason = TARGET_STOPPED_BY_NO_REASON;
+ lp->status_pending_p = 0;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Like linux_resume_one_lwp_throw, but no error is thrown if the LWP
+ disappears while we try to resume it. */
- perror_with_name ("ptrace");
+static void
+linux_resume_one_lwp (struct lwp_info *lwp,
+ int step, int signal, siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ TRY
+ {
+ linux_resume_one_lwp_throw (lwp, step, signal, info);
+ }
+ CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+ {
+ if (!check_ptrace_stopped_lwp_gone (lwp))
+ throw_exception (ex);
}
+ END_CATCH
}
struct thread_resume_array