* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_gdbarch_init): Use set_gdbarch_print_insn ...

[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / i386gnu-nat.c

diff --git a/gdb/i386gnu-nat.c b/gdb/i386gnu-nat.c
index 3fa99a34d884facf47f02e08cd6bf2bed8599d6c..4623e116cfc8bcdadce51e537c5ada3ce4e843c6 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/i386gnu-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/i386gnu-nat.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ store_fpregs (struct proc *thread, int regno)
     }
 
   /* FIXME: kettenis/2001-07-15: Is this right?  Should we somehow
-     take into account REGISTER_VALID like the old code did?  */
+     take into account DEPRECATED_REGISTER_VALID like the old code did?  */
   i387_fill_fsave (state.hw_state, regno);
 
   err = thread_set_state (thread->port, i386_FLOAT_STATE,
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ gnu_store_registers (int regno)
        }
 
 #define fill(state, regno)                                               \
-  memcpy (REG_ADDR(state, regno), &registers[REGISTER_BYTE (regno)],     \
+  memcpy (REG_ADDR(state, regno), &deprecated_registers[REGISTER_BYTE (regno)],     \
           REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regno))
 
       if (regno == -1)
@@ -266,14 +266,14 @@ gnu_store_registers (int regno)
          proc_debug (thread, "storing all registers");
 
          for (i = 0; i < I386_NUM_GREGS; i++)
-           if (register_valid[i])
+           if (deprecated_register_valid[i])
              fill (state, i);
        }
       else
        {
          proc_debug (thread, "storing register %s", REGISTER_NAME (regno));
 
-         gdb_assert (register_valid[regno]);
+         gdb_assert (deprecated_register_valid[regno]);
          fill (state, regno);
        }