return 0;
cached_proc_desc = proc_desc;
- return read_next_frame_reg(frame, PROC_FRAME_REG(proc_desc))
- + PROC_FRAME_OFFSET(proc_desc);
+
+ /* If no frame pointer and frame size is zero, we must be at end
+ of stack (or otherwise hosed). If we don't check frame size,
+ we loop forever if we see a zero size frame. */
+ if (PROC_FRAME_REG (proc_desc) == SP_REGNUM
+ && PROC_FRAME_OFFSET (proc_desc) == 0
+ /* Frameless functions, which can happen on the innermost frame
+ or a frame which was innermost when a signal happened, can
+ have frame size zero. No need to check for non-frameless
+ functions in these situations, though (I don't think). */
+ && frame->next != NULL
+ && !frame->next->signal_handler_caller)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return read_next_frame_reg(frame, PROC_FRAME_REG(proc_desc))
+ + PROC_FRAME_OFFSET(proc_desc);
}
void
write_register_bytes(REGISTER_BYTE (regnum), raw_buffer, TYPE_LENGTH (valtype));
}
-static void reinit_frame_cache_sfunc PARAMS ((char *, int
+static void reinit_frame_cache_sfunc PARAMS ((char *, int,
struct cmd_list_element *));
/* Just like reinit_frame_cache, but with the right arguments to be
or dealing with return values.", &setlist),
&showlist);
- c = add_set_cmd ("heuristic-fence-post", class_support, var_uinteger,
+ /* We really would like to have both "0" and "unlimited" work, but
+ command.c doesn't deal with that. So make it a var_zinteger
+ because the user can always use "999999" or some such for unlimited. */
+ c = add_set_cmd ("heuristic-fence-post", class_support, var_zinteger,
(char *) &heuristic_fence_post,
"\
Set the distance searched for the start of a function.\n\