unsigned long reg_mask = 0;
if (start_pc == 0) return NULL;
- bzero(&temp_proc_desc, sizeof(temp_proc_desc));
- bzero(&temp_saved_regs, sizeof(struct frame_saved_regs));
+ memset(&temp_proc_desc, '\0', sizeof(temp_proc_desc));
+ memset(&temp_saved_regs, '\0', sizeof(struct frame_saved_regs));
PROC_LOW_ADDR(&temp_proc_desc) = start_pc;
if (start_pc + 200 < limit_pc) limit_pc = start_pc + 200;
return 0;
cached_proc_desc = proc_desc;
- return read_next_frame_reg(frame, PROC_FRAME_REG(proc_desc))
- + PROC_FRAME_OFFSET(proc_desc);
+
+ /* If no frame pointer and frame size is zero, we must be at end
+ of stack (or otherwise hosed). If we don't check frame size,
+ we loop forever if we see a zero size frame. */
+ if (PROC_FRAME_REG (proc_desc) == SP_REGNUM
+ && PROC_FRAME_OFFSET (proc_desc) == 0
+ /* Frameless functions, which can happen on the innermost frame
+ or a frame which was innermost when a signal happened, can
+ have frame size zero. No need to check for non-frameless
+ functions in these situations, though (I don't think). */
+ && frame->next != NULL
+ && !frame->next->signal_handler_caller)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return read_next_frame_reg(frame, PROC_FRAME_REG(proc_desc))
+ + PROC_FRAME_OFFSET(proc_desc);
}
void
return -1;
}
\f
-/* Does this instruction involve use of a delay slot? */
+/* Is this a branch with a delay slot? */
static int
is_delayed (insn)
unsigned long insn;
if (mips_opcodes[i].pinfo != INSN_MACRO
&& (insn & mips_opcodes[i].mask) == mips_opcodes[i].match)
break;
- return i < NUMOPCODES && (mips_opcodes[i].pinfo & ANY_DELAY);
+ return (i < NUMOPCODES
+ && (mips_opcodes[i].pinfo & (INSN_UNCOND_BRANCH_DELAY
+ | INSN_COND_BRANCH_DELAY
+ | INSN_COND_BRANCH_LIKELY)));
}
/* To skip prologues, I use this predicate. Returns either PC itself
write_register_bytes(REGISTER_BYTE (regnum), raw_buffer, TYPE_LENGTH (valtype));
}
-/* Let the user turn off floating point and set the fence post for
- heuristic_proc_start. */
+static void reinit_frame_cache_sfunc PARAMS ((char *, int,
+ struct cmd_list_element *));
+
+/* Just like reinit_frame_cache, but with the right arguments to be
+ callable as an sfunc. */
+static void
+reinit_frame_cache_sfunc (args, from_tty, c)
+ char *args;
+ int from_tty;
+ struct cmd_list_element *c;
+{
+ reinit_frame_cache ();
+}
void
_initialize_mips_tdep ()
{
+ struct cmd_list_element *c;
+
+ /* Let the user turn off floating point and set the fence post for
+ heuristic_proc_start. */
+
add_show_from_set
(add_set_cmd ("mipsfpu", class_support, var_boolean,
(char *) &mips_fpu,
or dealing with return values.", &setlist),
&showlist);
- add_show_from_set
- (add_set_cmd ("heuristic-fence-post", class_support, var_uinteger,
- (char *) &heuristic_fence_post,
- "\
+ /* We really would like to have both "0" and "unlimited" work, but
+ command.c doesn't deal with that. So make it a var_zinteger
+ because the user can always use "999999" or some such for unlimited. */
+ c = add_set_cmd ("heuristic-fence-post", class_support, var_zinteger,
+ (char *) &heuristic_fence_post,
+ "\
Set the distance searched for the start of a function.\n\
If you are debugging a stripped executable, GDB needs to search through the\n\
program for the start of a function. This command sets the distance of the\n\
search. The only need to set it is when debugging a stripped executable.",
- &setlist),
- &showlist);
+ &setlist);
+ /* We need to throw away the frame cache when we set this, since it
+ might change our ability to get backtraces. */
+ c->function.sfunc = reinit_frame_cache_sfunc;
+ add_show_from_set (c, &showlist);
}