`ctf` plugin: Use CTF_BYTE_ORDER_UNKNOWN in place of -1

`ctf` plugin: Use CTF_BYTE_ORDER_UNKNOWN in place of -1

Seen on clang-3.9, 4.0 and clang-1001.0.46.4.

  Comparison of constant -1 with expression of type 'enum *****'
  is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]

Note that the enum underlying type is implementation defined and left to
the choice of the compiler by the standard [1] (6.7.2.2 4). Most
compiler default to unsigned int. The use of -1 is not a problem per see
since wrap around of unsigned int behaviour is not undefined. Using -1
is the equivalent of assigning UINT_MAX here. This warning was removed
for later clang for these specific cases since the effect of always being
false is erroneous.

Still, it make more sense to use a specific enum for such case instead
of relying on the compiler type.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte <jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com>
Change-Id: I5dcbaa2066cbab8c429ff54e8d8b8b295fc8baf1
Reviewed-on: https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/1764
CI-Build: Philippe Proulx <eeppeliteloop@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Proulx <eeppeliteloop@gmail.com>