gdb: resume ongoing step after handling fork or vfork
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gprof / gprof.texi
1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @setfilename gprof.info
3 @c Copyright (C) 1988-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4 @settitle GNU gprof
5 @setchapternewpage odd
6
7 @c man begin INCLUDE
8 @include bfdver.texi
9 @c man end
10
11 @ifnottex
12 @c This is a dir.info fragment to support semi-automated addition of
13 @c manuals to an info tree. zoo@cygnus.com is developing this facility.
14 @dircategory Software development
15 @direntry
16 * gprof: (gprof). Profiling your program's execution
17 @end direntry
18 @end ifnottex
19
20 @copying
21 This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system.
22
23 @c man begin COPYRIGHT
24 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
25
26 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
27 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
28 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
29 with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
30 Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the
31 section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
32
33 @c man end
34 @end copying
35
36 @finalout
37 @smallbook
38
39 @titlepage
40 @title GNU gprof
41 @subtitle The @sc{gnu} Profiler
42 @ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
43 @subtitle @value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
44 @end ifset
45 @subtitle Version @value{VERSION}
46 @author Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman
47
48 @page
49
50 This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
51 can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
52 execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
53 execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
54 Eric S. Raymond made some minor corrections and additions in 2003.
55
56 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
57 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
58
59 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
60 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
61 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
62 with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
63 Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the
64 section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
65
66 @end titlepage
67 @contents
68
69 @ifnottex
70 @node Top
71 @top Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time?
72
73 This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
74 can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
75 execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
76 execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
77
78 This manual is for @code{gprof}
79 @ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
80 @value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
81 @end ifset
82 version @value{VERSION}.
83
84 This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free
85 Documentation License version 1.3. A copy of the license is included
86 in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
87
88 @menu
89 * Introduction:: What profiling means, and why it is useful.
90
91 * Compiling:: How to compile your program for profiling.
92 * Executing:: Executing your program to generate profile data
93 * Invoking:: How to run @code{gprof}, and its options
94
95 * Output:: Interpreting @code{gprof}'s output
96
97 * Inaccuracy:: Potential problems you should be aware of
98 * How do I?:: Answers to common questions
99 * Incompatibilities:: (between @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Unix @code{gprof}.)
100 * Details:: Details of how profiling is done
101 * GNU Free Documentation License:: GNU Free Documentation License
102 @end menu
103 @end ifnottex
104
105 @node Introduction
106 @chapter Introduction to Profiling
107
108 @ifset man
109 @c man title gprof display call graph profile data
110
111 @smallexample
112 @c man begin SYNOPSIS
113 gprof [ -[abcDhilLrsTvwxyz] ] [ -[ACeEfFJnNOpPqQRStZ][@var{name}] ]
114 [ -I @var{dirs} ] [ -d[@var{num}] ] [ -k @var{from/to} ]
115 [ -m @var{min-count} ] [ -R @var{map_file} ] [ -t @var{table-length} ]
116 [ --[no-]annotated-source[=@var{name}] ]
117 [ --[no-]exec-counts[=@var{name}] ]
118 [ --[no-]flat-profile[=@var{name}] ] [ --[no-]graph[=@var{name}] ]
119 [ --[no-]time=@var{name}] [ --all-lines ] [ --brief ]
120 [ --debug[=@var{level}] ] [ --function-ordering ]
121 [ --file-ordering @var{map_file} ] [ --directory-path=@var{dirs} ]
122 [ --display-unused-functions ] [ --file-format=@var{name} ]
123 [ --file-info ] [ --help ] [ --line ] [ --inline-file-names ]
124 [ --min-count=@var{n} ] [ --no-static ] [ --print-path ]
125 [ --separate-files ] [ --static-call-graph ] [ --sum ]
126 [ --table-length=@var{len} ] [ --traditional ] [ --version ]
127 [ --width=@var{n} ] [ --ignore-non-functions ]
128 [ --demangle[=@var{STYLE}] ] [ --no-demangle ]
129 [--external-symbol-table=name]
130 [ @var{image-file} ] [ @var{profile-file} @dots{} ]
131 @c man end
132 @end smallexample
133
134 @c man begin DESCRIPTION
135 @code{gprof} produces an execution profile of C, Pascal, or Fortran77
136 programs. The effect of called routines is incorporated in the profile
137 of each caller. The profile data is taken from the call graph profile file
138 (@file{gmon.out} default) which is created by programs
139 that are compiled with the @samp{-pg} option of
140 @code{cc}, @code{pc}, and @code{f77}.
141 The @samp{-pg} option also links in versions of the library routines
142 that are compiled for profiling. @code{Gprof} reads the given object
143 file (the default is @code{a.out}) and establishes the relation between
144 its symbol table and the call graph profile from @file{gmon.out}.
145 If more than one profile file is specified, the @code{gprof}
146 output shows the sum of the profile information in the given profile files.
147
148 @code{Gprof} calculates the amount of time spent in each routine.
149 Next, these times are propagated along the edges of the call graph.
150 Cycles are discovered, and calls into a cycle are made to share the time
151 of the cycle.
152
153 @c man end
154
155 @c man begin BUGS
156 The granularity of the sampling is shown, but remains
157 statistical at best.
158 We assume that the time for each execution of a function
159 can be expressed by the total time for the function divided
160 by the number of times the function is called.
161 Thus the time propagated along the call graph arcs to the function's
162 parents is directly proportional to the number of times that
163 arc is traversed.
164
165 Parents that are not themselves profiled will have the time of
166 their profiled children propagated to them, but they will appear
167 to be spontaneously invoked in the call graph listing, and will
168 not have their time propagated further.
169 Similarly, signal catchers, even though profiled, will appear
170 to be spontaneous (although for more obscure reasons).
171 Any profiled children of signal catchers should have their times
172 propagated properly, unless the signal catcher was invoked during
173 the execution of the profiling routine, in which case all is lost.
174
175 The profiled program must call @code{exit}(2)
176 or return normally for the profiling information to be saved
177 in the @file{gmon.out} file.
178 @c man end
179
180 @c man begin FILES
181 @table @code
182 @item @file{a.out}
183 the namelist and text space.
184 @item @file{gmon.out}
185 dynamic call graph and profile.
186 @item @file{gmon.sum}
187 summarized dynamic call graph and profile.
188 @end table
189 @c man end
190
191 @c man begin SEEALSO
192 monitor(3), profil(2), cc(1), prof(1), and the Info entry for @file{gprof}.
193
194 ``An Execution Profiler for Modular Programs'',
195 by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
196 Software - Practice and Experience,
197 Vol. 13, pp. 671-685, 1983.
198
199 ``gprof: A Call Graph Execution Profiler'',
200 by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
201 Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '82 Symposium on Compiler Construction,
202 SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 17, No 6, pp. 120-126, June 1982.
203 @c man end
204 @end ifset
205
206 Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and which
207 functions called which other functions while it was executing. This
208 information can show you which pieces of your program are slower than you
209 expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your program
210 execute faster. It can also tell you which functions are being called more
211 or less often than you expected. This may help you spot bugs that had
212 otherwise been unnoticed.
213
214 Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual execution
215 of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large or too
216 complex to analyze by reading the source. However, how your program is run
217 will affect the information that shows up in the profile data. If you
218 don't use some feature of your program while it is being profiled, no
219 profile information will be generated for that feature.
220
221 Profiling has several steps:
222
223 @itemize @bullet
224 @item
225 You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled.
226 @xref{Compiling, ,Compiling a Program for Profiling}.
227
228 @item
229 You must execute your program to generate a profile data file.
230 @xref{Executing, ,Executing the Program}.
231
232 @item
233 You must run @code{gprof} to analyze the profile data.
234 @xref{Invoking, ,@code{gprof} Command Summary}.
235 @end itemize
236
237 The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail.
238
239 @c man begin DESCRIPTION
240
241 Several forms of output are available from the analysis.
242
243 The @dfn{flat profile} shows how much time your program spent in each function,
244 and how many times that function was called. If you simply want to know
245 which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated concisely here.
246 @xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
247
248 The @dfn{call graph} shows, for each function, which functions called it, which
249 other functions it called, and how many times. There is also an estimate
250 of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function. This can
251 suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls that use a
252 lot of time. @xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
253
254 The @dfn{annotated source} listing is a copy of the program's
255 source code, labeled with the number of times each line of the
256 program was executed. @xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source
257 Listing}.
258 @c man end
259
260 To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read
261 a description of its implementation.
262 @xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
263
264 @node Compiling
265 @chapter Compiling a Program for Profiling
266
267 The first step in generating profile information for your program is
268 to compile and link it with profiling enabled.
269
270 To compile a source file for profiling, specify the @samp{-pg} option when
271 you run the compiler. (This is in addition to the options you normally
272 use.)
273
274 To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as @code{cc}
275 to do the linking, simply specify @samp{-pg} in addition to your usual
276 options. The same option, @samp{-pg}, alters either compilation or linking
277 to do what is necessary for profiling. Here are examples:
278
279 @example
280 cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg
281 cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg
282 @end example
283
284 The @samp{-pg} option also works with a command that both compiles and links:
285
286 @example
287 cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg
288 @end example
289
290 Note: The @samp{-pg} option must be part of your compilation options
291 as well as your link options. If it is not then no call-graph data
292 will be gathered and when you run @code{gprof} you will get an error
293 message like this:
294
295 @example
296 gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
297 @end example
298
299 If you add the @samp{-Q} switch to suppress the printing of the call
300 graph data you will still be able to see the time samples:
301
302 @example
303 Flat profile:
304
305 Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
306 % cumulative self self total
307 time seconds seconds calls Ts/call Ts/call name
308 44.12 0.07 0.07 zazLoop
309 35.29 0.14 0.06 main
310 20.59 0.17 0.04 bazMillion
311 @end example
312
313 If you run the linker @code{ld} directly instead of through a compiler
314 such as @code{cc}, you may have to specify a profiling startup file
315 @file{gcrt0.o} as the first input file instead of the usual startup
316 file @file{crt0.o}. In addition, you would probably want to
317 specify the profiling C library, @file{libc_p.a}, by writing
318 @samp{-lc_p} instead of the usual @samp{-lc}. This is not absolutely
319 necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls information for
320 standard library functions such as @code{read} and @code{open}. For
321 example:
322
323 @example
324 ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p
325 @end example
326
327 If you are running the program on a system which supports shared
328 libraries you may run into problems with the profiling support code in
329 a shared library being called before that library has been fully
330 initialised. This is usually detected by the program encountering a
331 segmentation fault as soon as it is run. The solution is to link
332 against a static version of the library containing the profiling
333 support code, which for @code{gcc} users can be done via the
334 @samp{-static} or @samp{-static-libgcc} command-line option. For
335 example:
336
337 @example
338 gcc -g -pg -static-libgcc myprog.c utils.c -o myprog
339 @end example
340
341 If you compile only some of the modules of the program with @samp{-pg}, you
342 can still profile the program, but you won't get complete information about
343 the modules that were compiled without @samp{-pg}. The only information
344 you get for the functions in those modules is the total time spent in them;
345 there is no record of how many times they were called, or from where. This
346 will not affect the flat profile (except that the @code{calls} field for
347 the functions will be blank), but will greatly reduce the usefulness of the
348 call graph.
349
350 If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling you should use the
351 @code{gcov} tool instead of @code{gprof}. See that tool's manual or
352 info pages for more details of how to do this.
353
354 Note, older versions of @code{gcc} produce line-by-line profiling
355 information that works with @code{gprof} rather than @code{gcov} so
356 there is still support for displaying this kind of information in
357 @code{gprof}. @xref{Line-by-line, ,Line-by-line Profiling}.
358
359 It also worth noting that @code{gcc} implements a
360 @samp{-finstrument-functions} command-line option which will insert
361 calls to special user supplied instrumentation routines at the entry
362 and exit of every function in their program. This can be used to
363 implement an alternative profiling scheme.
364
365 @node Executing
366 @chapter Executing the Program
367
368 Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to
369 generate the information that @code{gprof} needs. Simply run the program
370 as usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc. The program should
371 run normally, producing the same output as usual. It will, however, run
372 somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and
373 writing the profile data.
374
375 The way you run the program---the arguments and input that you give
376 it---may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows. The
377 profile data will describe the parts of the program that were activated for
378 the particular input you use. For example, if the first command you give
379 to your program is to quit, the profile data will show the time used in
380 initialization and in cleanup, but not much else.
381
382 Your program will write the profile data into a file called @file{gmon.out}
383 just before exiting. If there is already a file called @file{gmon.out},
384 its contents are overwritten. You can rename the file afterwards if you
385 are concerned that it may be overwritten. If your system libc allows you
386 may be able to write the profile data under a different name. Set the
387 GMON_OUT_PREFIX environment variable; this name will be appended with
388 the PID of the running program.
389
390 In order to write the @file{gmon.out} file properly, your program must exit
391 normally: by returning from @code{main} or by calling @code{exit}. Calling
392 the low-level function @code{_exit} does not write the profile data, and
393 neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal.
394
395 The @file{gmon.out} file is written in the program's @emph{current working
396 directory} at the time it exits. This means that if your program calls
397 @code{chdir}, the @file{gmon.out} file will be left in the last directory
398 your program @code{chdir}'d to. If you don't have permission to write in
399 this directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message.
400
401 Older versions of the @sc{gnu} profiling library may also write a file
402 called @file{bb.out}. This file, if present, contains an human-readable
403 listing of the basic-block execution counts. Unfortunately, the
404 appearance of a human-readable @file{bb.out} means the basic-block
405 counts didn't get written into @file{gmon.out}.
406 The Perl script @code{bbconv.pl}, included with the @code{gprof}
407 source distribution, will convert a @file{bb.out} file into
408 a format readable by @code{gprof}. Invoke it like this:
409
410 @smallexample
411 bbconv.pl < bb.out > @var{bh-data}
412 @end smallexample
413
414 This translates the information in @file{bb.out} into a form that
415 @code{gprof} can understand. But you still need to tell @code{gprof}
416 about the existence of this translated information. To do that, include
417 @var{bb-data} on the @code{gprof} command line, @emph{along with
418 @file{gmon.out}}, like this:
419
420 @smallexample
421 gprof @var{options} @var{executable-file} gmon.out @var{bb-data} [@var{yet-more-profile-data-files}@dots{}] [> @var{outfile}]
422 @end smallexample
423
424 @node Invoking
425 @chapter @code{gprof} Command Summary
426
427 After you have a profile data file @file{gmon.out}, you can run @code{gprof}
428 to interpret the information in it. The @code{gprof} program prints a
429 flat profile and a call graph on standard output. Typically you would
430 redirect the output of @code{gprof} into a file with @samp{>}.
431
432 You run @code{gprof} like this:
433
434 @smallexample
435 gprof @var{options} [@var{executable-file} [@var{profile-data-files}@dots{}]] [> @var{outfile}]
436 @end smallexample
437
438 @noindent
439 Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments.
440
441 If you omit the executable file name, the file @file{a.out} is used. If
442 you give no profile data file name, the file @file{gmon.out} is used. If
443 any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not
444 appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed.
445
446 You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their names
447 after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the data files
448 are summed together.
449
450 The order of these options does not matter.
451
452 @menu
453 * Output Options:: Controlling @code{gprof}'s output style
454 * Analysis Options:: Controlling how @code{gprof} analyzes its data
455 * Miscellaneous Options::
456 * Deprecated Options:: Options you no longer need to use, but which
457 have been retained for compatibility
458 * Symspecs:: Specifying functions to include or exclude
459 @end menu
460
461 @node Output Options
462 @section Output Options
463
464 @c man begin OPTIONS
465 These options specify which of several output formats
466 @code{gprof} should produce.
467
468 Many of these options take an optional @dfn{symspec} to specify
469 functions to be included or excluded. These options can be
470 specified multiple times, with different symspecs, to include
471 or exclude sets of symbols. @xref{Symspecs, ,Symspecs}.
472
473 Specifying any of these options overrides the default (@samp{-p -q}),
474 which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis
475 for all functions.
476
477 @table @code
478
479 @item -A[@var{symspec}]
480 @itemx --annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
481 The @samp{-A} option causes @code{gprof} to print annotated source code.
482 If @var{symspec} is specified, print output only for matching symbols.
483 @xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source Listing}.
484
485 @item -b
486 @itemx --brief
487 If the @samp{-b} option is given, @code{gprof} doesn't print the
488 verbose blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in
489 the tables. This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or
490 are tired of seeing the blurbs.
491
492 @item -C[@var{symspec}]
493 @itemx --exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
494 The @samp{-C} option causes @code{gprof} to
495 print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
496 If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally only for matching symbols.
497
498 If the profile data file contains basic-block count records, specifying
499 the @samp{-l} option, along with @samp{-C}, will cause basic-block
500 execution counts to be tallied and displayed.
501
502 @item -i
503 @itemx --file-info
504 The @samp{-i} option causes @code{gprof} to display summary information
505 about the profile data file(s) and then exit. The number of histogram,
506 call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed.
507
508 @item -I @var{dirs}
509 @itemx --directory-path=@var{dirs}
510 The @samp{-I} option specifies a list of search directories in
511 which to find source files. Environment variable @var{GPROF_PATH}
512 can also be used to convey this information.
513 Used mostly for annotated source output.
514
515 @item -J[@var{symspec}]
516 @itemx --no-annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
517 The @samp{-J} option causes @code{gprof} not to
518 print annotated source code.
519 If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints annotated source,
520 but excludes matching symbols.
521
522 @item -L
523 @itemx --print-path
524 Normally, source filenames are printed with the path
525 component suppressed. The @samp{-L} option causes @code{gprof}
526 to print the full pathname of
527 source filenames, which is determined
528 from symbolic debugging information in the image file
529 and is relative to the directory in which the compiler
530 was invoked.
531
532 @item -p[@var{symspec}]
533 @itemx --flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
534 The @samp{-p} option causes @code{gprof} to print a flat profile.
535 If @var{symspec} is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols.
536 @xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
537
538 @item -P[@var{symspec}]
539 @itemx --no-flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
540 The @samp{-P} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing a flat profile.
541 If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a flat profile,
542 but excludes matching symbols.
543
544 @item -q[@var{symspec}]
545 @itemx --graph[=@var{symspec}]
546 The @samp{-q} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis.
547 If @var{symspec} is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols
548 and their children.
549 @xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
550
551 @item -Q[@var{symspec}]
552 @itemx --no-graph[=@var{symspec}]
553 The @samp{-Q} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing the
554 call graph.
555 If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a call graph,
556 but excludes matching symbols.
557
558 @item -t
559 @itemx --table-length=@var{num}
560 The @samp{-t} option causes the @var{num} most active source lines in
561 each source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled. The
562 default is 10.
563
564 @item -y
565 @itemx --separate-files
566 This option affects annotated source output only.
567 Normally, @code{gprof} prints annotated source files
568 to standard-output. If this option is specified,
569 annotated source for a file named @file{path/@var{filename}}
570 is generated in the file @file{@var{filename}-ann}. If the underlying
571 file system would truncate @file{@var{filename}-ann} so that it
572 overwrites the original @file{@var{filename}}, @code{gprof} generates
573 annotated source in the file @file{@var{filename}.ann} instead (if the
574 original file name has an extension, that extension is @emph{replaced}
575 with @file{.ann}).
576
577 @item -Z[@var{symspec}]
578 @itemx --no-exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
579 The @samp{-Z} option causes @code{gprof} not to
580 print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
581 If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally, but exclude matching symbols.
582
583 @item -r
584 @itemx --function-ordering
585 The @samp{--function-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
586 suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling data.
587 This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
588 cache behavior for the program on systems which support arbitrary
589 ordering of functions in an executable.
590
591 The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions
592 in a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this
593 manual.
594
595 @item -R @var{map_file}
596 @itemx --file-ordering @var{map_file}
597 The @samp{--file-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
598 suggested .o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data.
599 This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
600 cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary
601 ordering of functions in an executable.
602
603 Use of the @samp{-a} argument is highly recommended with this option.
604
605 The @var{map_file} argument is a pathname to a file which provides
606 function name to object file mappings. The format of the file is similar to
607 the output of the program @code{nm}.
608
609 @smallexample
610 @group
611 c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse
612 c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag
613 c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name
614 c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics
615 c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword
616 c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier
617 c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type
618 @dots{}
619
620 @end group
621 @end smallexample
622
623 To create a @var{map_file} with @sc{gnu} @code{nm}, type a command like
624 @kbd{nm --extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name}.
625
626 @item -T
627 @itemx --traditional
628 The @samp{-T} option causes @code{gprof} to print its output in
629 ``traditional'' BSD style.
630
631 @item -w @var{width}
632 @itemx --width=@var{width}
633 Sets width of output lines to @var{width}.
634 Currently only used when printing the function index at the bottom
635 of the call graph.
636
637 @item -x
638 @itemx --all-lines
639 This option affects annotated source output only.
640 By default, only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block
641 are annotated. If this option is specified, every line in
642 a basic-block is annotated by repeating the annotation for the
643 first line. This behavior is similar to @code{tcov}'s @samp{-a}.
644
645 @item --demangle[=@var{style}]
646 @itemx --no-demangle
647 These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled when
648 printing output. The default is to demangle symbols. The
649 @code{--no-demangle} option may be used to turn off demangling. Different
650 compilers have different mangling styles. The optional demangling style
651 argument can be used to choose an appropriate demangling style for your
652 compiler.
653 @end table
654
655 @node Analysis Options
656 @section Analysis Options
657
658 @table @code
659
660 @item -a
661 @itemx --no-static
662 The @samp{-a} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress the printing of
663 statically declared (private) functions. (These are functions whose
664 names are not listed as global, and which are not visible outside the
665 file/function/block where they were defined.) Time spent in these
666 functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be attributed to the
667 function that was loaded directly before it in the executable file.
668 @c This is compatible with Unix @code{gprof}, but a bad idea.
669 This option affects both the flat profile and the call graph.
670
671 @item -c
672 @itemx --static-call-graph
673 The @samp{-c} option causes the call graph of the program to be
674 augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the object
675 file and identifies function calls in the binary machine code.
676 Since normal call graph records are only generated when functions are
677 entered, this option identifies children that could have been called,
678 but never were. Calls to functions that were not compiled with
679 profiling enabled are also identified, but only if symbol table
680 entries are present for them.
681 Calls to dynamic library routines are typically @emph{not} found
682 by this option.
683 Parents or children identified via this heuristic
684 are indicated in the call graph with call counts of @samp{0}.
685
686 @item -D
687 @itemx --ignore-non-functions
688 The @samp{-D} option causes @code{gprof} to ignore symbols which
689 are not known to be functions. This option will give more accurate
690 profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for
691 example).
692
693 @item -k @var{from}/@var{to}
694 The @samp{-k} option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs from
695 symbols matching symspec @var{from} to those matching symspec @var{to}.
696
697 @item -l
698 @itemx --line
699 The @samp{-l} option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes
700 histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines,
701 instead of functions. This feature only works with programs compiled
702 by older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler. Newer versions of
703 @code{gcc} are designed to work with the @code{gcov} tool instead.
704
705 If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled,
706 this option will also identify how many times each line of
707 code was executed.
708 While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function
709 a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases
710 the running time of @code{gprof}, and magnifies statistical
711 inaccuracies.
712 @xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error}.
713
714 @item --inline-file-names
715 This option causes @code{gprof} to print the source file after each
716 symbol in both the flat profile and the call graph. The full path to the
717 file is printed if used with the @samp{-L} option.
718
719 @item -m @var{num}
720 @itemx --min-count=@var{num}
721 This option affects execution count output only.
722 Symbols that are executed less than @var{num} times are suppressed.
723
724 @item -n@var{symspec}
725 @itemx --time=@var{symspec}
726 The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
727 to only propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
728
729 @item -N@var{symspec}
730 @itemx --no-time=@var{symspec}
731 The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
732 not to propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
733
734 @item -S@var{filename}
735 @itemx --external-symbol-table=@var{filename}
736 The @samp{-S} option causes @code{gprof} to read an external symbol table
737 file, such as @file{/proc/kallsyms}, rather than read the symbol table
738 from the given object file (the default is @code{a.out}). This is useful
739 for profiling kernel modules.
740
741 @item -z
742 @itemx --display-unused-functions
743 If you give the @samp{-z} option, @code{gprof} will mention all
744 functions in the flat profile, even those that were never called, and
745 that had no time spent in them. This is useful in conjunction with the
746 @samp{-c} option for discovering which routines were never called.
747
748 @end table
749
750 @node Miscellaneous Options
751 @section Miscellaneous Options
752
753 @table @code
754
755 @item -d[@var{num}]
756 @itemx --debug[=@var{num}]
757 The @samp{-d @var{num}} option specifies debugging options.
758 If @var{num} is not specified, enable all debugging.
759 @xref{Debugging, ,Debugging @code{gprof}}.
760
761 @item -h
762 @itemx --help
763 The @samp{-h} option prints command line usage.
764
765 @item -O@var{name}
766 @itemx --file-format=@var{name}
767 Selects the format of the profile data files. Recognized formats are
768 @samp{auto} (the default), @samp{bsd}, @samp{4.4bsd}, @samp{magic}, and
769 @samp{prof} (not yet supported).
770
771 @item -s
772 @itemx --sum
773 The @samp{-s} option causes @code{gprof} to summarize the information
774 in the profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data
775 file called @file{gmon.sum}, which contains all the information from
776 the profile data files that @code{gprof} read in. The file @file{gmon.sum}
777 may be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to
778 merge the data in the other input files into @file{gmon.sum}.
779
780 Eventually you can run @code{gprof} again without @samp{-s} to analyze the
781 cumulative data in the file @file{gmon.sum}.
782
783 @item -v
784 @itemx --version
785 The @samp{-v} flag causes @code{gprof} to print the current version
786 number, and then exit.
787
788 @end table
789
790 @node Deprecated Options
791 @section Deprecated Options
792
793 These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs.
794
795 @table @code
796
797 @item -e @var{function_name}
798 The @samp{-e @var{function}} option tells @code{gprof} to not print
799 information about the function @var{function_name} (and its
800 children@dots{}) in the call graph. The function will still be listed
801 as a child of any functions that call it, but its index number will be
802 shown as @samp{[not printed]}. More than one @samp{-e} option may be
803 given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-e}
804 option.
805
806 @item -E @var{function_name}
807 The @code{-E @var{function}} option works like the @code{-e} option, but
808 time spent in the function (and children who were not called from
809 anywhere else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for
810 the call graph. More than one @samp{-E} option may be given; only one
811 @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-E} option.
812
813 @item -f @var{function_name}
814 The @samp{-f @var{function}} option causes @code{gprof} to limit the
815 call graph to the function @var{function_name} and its children (and
816 their children@dots{}). More than one @samp{-f} option may be given;
817 only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-f}
818 option.
819
820 @item -F @var{function_name}
821 The @samp{-F @var{function}} option works like the @code{-f} option, but
822 only time spent in the function and its children (and their
823 children@dots{}) will be used to determine total-time and
824 percentages-of-time for the call graph. More than one @samp{-F} option
825 may be given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each
826 @samp{-F} option. The @samp{-F} option overrides the @samp{-E} option.
827
828 @end table
829
830 @c man end
831
832 Note that only one function can be specified with each @code{-e},
833 @code{-E}, @code{-f} or @code{-F} option. To specify more than one
834 function, use multiple options. For example, this command:
835
836 @example
837 gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output
838 @end example
839
840 @noindent
841 lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either
842 @code{foo} or @code{bar} and were not reachable from @code{boring}.
843
844 @node Symspecs
845 @section Symspecs
846
847 Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded
848 using @dfn{symspecs} (symbol specifications), which observe the
849 following syntax:
850
851 @example
852 filename_containing_a_dot
853 | funcname_not_containing_a_dot
854 | linenumber
855 | ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) )
856 @end example
857
858 Here are some sample symspecs:
859
860 @table @samp
861 @item main.c
862 Selects everything in file @file{main.c}---the
863 dot in the string tells @code{gprof} to interpret
864 the string as a filename, rather than as
865 a function name. To select a file whose
866 name does not contain a dot, a trailing colon
867 should be specified. For example, @samp{odd:} is
868 interpreted as the file named @file{odd}.
869
870 @item main
871 Selects all functions named @samp{main}.
872
873 Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name
874 because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static). Unless a
875 function name is unique in a program, you must use the colon notation
876 explained below to specify a function from a specific source file.
877
878 Sometimes, function names contain dots. In such cases, it is necessary
879 to add a leading colon to the name. For example, @samp{:.mul} selects
880 function @samp{.mul}.
881
882 In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore.
883 @code{gprof} will normally not print these underscores. When you name a
884 symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as @code{gprof} prints
885 it in its output. For example, if the compiler produces a symbol
886 @samp{_main} from your @code{main} function, @code{gprof} still prints
887 it as @samp{main} in its output, so you should use @samp{main} in
888 symspecs.
889
890 @item main.c:main
891 Selects function @samp{main} in file @file{main.c}.
892
893 @item main.c:134
894 Selects line 134 in file @file{main.c}.
895 @end table
896
897 @node Output
898 @chapter Interpreting @code{gprof}'s Output
899
900 @code{gprof} can produce several different output styles, the
901 most important of which are described below. The simplest output
902 styles (file information, execution count, and function and file ordering)
903 are not described here, but are documented with the respective options
904 that trigger them.
905 @xref{Output Options, ,Output Options}.
906
907 @menu
908 * Flat Profile:: The flat profile shows how much time was spent
909 executing directly in each function.
910 * Call Graph:: The call graph shows which functions called which
911 others, and how much time each function used
912 when its subroutine calls are included.
913 * Line-by-line:: @code{gprof} can analyze individual source code lines
914 * Annotated Source:: The annotated source listing displays source code
915 labeled with execution counts
916 @end menu
917
918
919 @node Flat Profile
920 @section The Flat Profile
921 @cindex flat profile
922
923 The @dfn{flat profile} shows the total amount of time your program
924 spent executing each function. Unless the @samp{-z} option is given,
925 functions with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls
926 to them, are not mentioned. Note that if a function was not compiled
927 for profiling, and didn't run long enough to show up on the program
928 counter histogram, it will be indistinguishable from a function that
929 was never called.
930
931 This is part of a flat profile for a small program:
932
933 @smallexample
934 @group
935 Flat profile:
936
937 Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
938 % cumulative self self total
939 time seconds seconds calls ms/call ms/call name
940 33.34 0.02 0.02 7208 0.00 0.00 open
941 16.67 0.03 0.01 244 0.04 0.12 offtime
942 16.67 0.04 0.01 8 1.25 1.25 memccpy
943 16.67 0.05 0.01 7 1.43 1.43 write
944 16.67 0.06 0.01 mcount
945 0.00 0.06 0.00 236 0.00 0.00 tzset
946 0.00 0.06 0.00 192 0.00 0.00 tolower
947 0.00 0.06 0.00 47 0.00 0.00 strlen
948 0.00 0.06 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 strchr
949 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 main
950 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 memcpy
951 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 10.11 print
952 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 profil
953 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 report
954 @dots{}
955 @end group
956 @end smallexample
957
958 @noindent
959 The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them,
960 then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name. The
961 functions @samp{mcount} and @samp{profil} are part of the profiling
962 apparatus and appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of
963 the amount of overhead due to profiling.
964
965 Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating
966 how much time each sample counted as.
967 This @dfn{sampling period} estimates the margin of error in each of the time
968 figures. A time figure that is not much larger than this is not
969 reliable. In this example, each sample counted as 0.01 seconds,
970 suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate.
971 The program's total execution time was 0.06
972 seconds, as indicated by the @samp{cumulative seconds} field. Since
973 each sample counted for 0.01 seconds, this means only six samples
974 were taken during the run. Two of the samples occurred while the
975 program was in the @samp{open} function, as indicated by the
976 @samp{self seconds} field. Each of the other four samples
977 occurred one each in @samp{offtime}, @samp{memccpy}, @samp{write},
978 and @samp{mcount}.
979 Since only six samples were taken, none of these values can
980 be regarded as particularly reliable.
981 In another run,
982 the @samp{self seconds} field for
983 @samp{mcount} might well be @samp{0.00} or @samp{0.02}.
984 @xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error},
985 for a complete discussion.
986
987 The remaining functions in the listing (those whose
988 @samp{self seconds} field is @samp{0.00}) didn't appear
989 in the histogram samples at all. However, the call graph
990 indicated that they were called, so therefore they are listed,
991 sorted in decreasing order by the @samp{calls} field.
992 Clearly some time was spent executing these functions,
993 but the paucity of histogram samples prevents any
994 determination of how much time each took.
995
996 Here is what the fields in each line mean:
997
998 @table @code
999 @item % time
1000 This is the percentage of the total execution time your program spent
1001 in this function. These should all add up to 100%.
1002
1003 @item cumulative seconds
1004 This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent
1005 executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions
1006 above this one in this table.
1007
1008 @item self seconds
1009 This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone.
1010 The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number.
1011
1012 @item calls
1013 This is the total number of times the function was called. If the
1014 function was never called, or the number of times it was called cannot
1015 be determined (probably because the function was not compiled with
1016 profiling enabled), the @dfn{calls} field is blank.
1017
1018 @item self ms/call
1019 This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1020 function per call, if this function is profiled. Otherwise, this field
1021 is blank for this function.
1022
1023 @item total ms/call
1024 This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1025 function and its descendants per call, if this function is profiled.
1026 Otherwise, this field is blank for this function.
1027 This is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph analysis.
1028
1029 @item name
1030 This is the name of the function. The flat profile is sorted by this
1031 field alphabetically after the @dfn{self seconds} and @dfn{calls}
1032 fields are sorted.
1033 @end table
1034
1035 @node Call Graph
1036 @section The Call Graph
1037 @cindex call graph
1038
1039 The @dfn{call graph} shows how much time was spent in each function
1040 and its children. From this information, you can find functions that,
1041 while they themselves may not have used much time, called other
1042 functions that did use unusual amounts of time.
1043
1044 Here is a sample call from a small program. This call came from the
1045 same @code{gprof} run as the flat profile example in the previous
1046 section.
1047
1048 @smallexample
1049 @group
1050 granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds
1051
1052 index % time self children called name
1053 <spontaneous>
1054 [1] 100.0 0.00 0.05 start [1]
1055 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
1056 0.00 0.00 1/2 on_exit [28]
1057 0.00 0.00 1/1 exit [59]
1058 -----------------------------------------------
1059 0.00 0.05 1/1 start [1]
1060 [2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2]
1061 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3]
1062 -----------------------------------------------
1063 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
1064 [3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
1065 0.00 0.03 8/8 timelocal [6]
1066 0.00 0.01 1/1 print [9]
1067 0.00 0.01 9/9 fgets [12]
1068 0.00 0.00 12/34 strncmp <cycle 1> [40]
1069 0.00 0.00 8/8 lookup [20]
1070 0.00 0.00 1/1 fopen [21]
1071 0.00 0.00 8/8 chewtime [24]
1072 0.00 0.00 8/16 skipspace [44]
1073 -----------------------------------------------
1074 [4] 59.8 0.01 0.02 8+472 <cycle 2 as a whole> [4]
1075 0.01 0.02 244+260 offtime <cycle 2> [7]
1076 0.00 0.00 236+1 tzset <cycle 2> [26]
1077 -----------------------------------------------
1078 @end group
1079 @end smallexample
1080
1081 The lines full of dashes divide this table into @dfn{entries}, one for each
1082 function. Each entry has one or more lines.
1083
1084 In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index number
1085 in square brackets. The end of this line says which function the entry is
1086 for. The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of this
1087 function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also called
1088 @dfn{children} when we speak of the call graph).
1089
1090 The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its subroutines.
1091
1092 The internal profiling function @code{mcount} (@pxref{Flat Profile, ,The
1093 Flat Profile}) is never mentioned in the call graph.
1094
1095 @menu
1096 * Primary:: Details of the primary line's contents.
1097 * Callers:: Details of caller-lines' contents.
1098 * Subroutines:: Details of subroutine-lines' contents.
1099 * Cycles:: When there are cycles of recursion,
1100 such as @code{a} calls @code{b} calls @code{a}@dots{}
1101 @end menu
1102
1103 @node Primary
1104 @subsection The Primary Line
1105
1106 The @dfn{primary line} in a call graph entry is the line that
1107 describes the function which the entry is about and gives the overall
1108 statistics for this function.
1109
1110 For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function
1111 @code{report} in our main example, together with the heading line that
1112 shows the names of the fields:
1113
1114 @smallexample
1115 @group
1116 index % time self children called name
1117 @dots{}
1118 [3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
1119 @end group
1120 @end smallexample
1121
1122 Here is what the fields in the primary line mean:
1123
1124 @table @code
1125 @item index
1126 Entries are numbered with consecutive integers. Each function
1127 therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of its
1128 primary line.
1129
1130 Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of
1131 another, gives its index number as well as its name. The index number
1132 guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that function.
1133
1134 @item % time
1135 This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this
1136 function, including time spent in subroutines called from this
1137 function.
1138
1139 The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of
1140 this function. Therefore, adding up these percentages is meaningless.
1141
1142 @item self
1143 This is the total amount of time spent in this function. This
1144 should be identical to the number printed in the @code{seconds} field
1145 for this function in the flat profile.
1146
1147 @item children
1148 This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made by
1149 this function. This should be equal to the sum of all the @code{self}
1150 and @code{children} entries of the children listed directly below this
1151 function.
1152
1153 @item called
1154 This is the number of times the function was called.
1155
1156 If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers,
1157 separated by a @samp{+}. The first number counts non-recursive calls,
1158 and the second counts recursive calls.
1159
1160 In the example above, the function @code{report} was called once from
1161 @code{main}.
1162
1163 @item name
1164 This is the name of the current function. The index number is
1165 repeated after it.
1166
1167 If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number is
1168 printed between the function's name and the index number
1169 (@pxref{Cycles, ,How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described}).
1170 For example, if function @code{gnurr} is part of
1171 cycle number one, and has index number twelve, its primary line would
1172 be end like this:
1173
1174 @example
1175 gnurr <cycle 1> [12]
1176 @end example
1177 @end table
1178
1179 @node Callers
1180 @subsection Lines for a Function's Callers
1181
1182 A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by.
1183 These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but
1184 their meanings are different because of the difference in context.
1185
1186 For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1187 @code{report}, the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together
1188 with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1189
1190 @smallexample
1191 index % time self children called name
1192 @dots{}
1193 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
1194 [3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
1195 @end smallexample
1196
1197 Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for @code{report}
1198 called from @code{main}:
1199
1200 @table @code
1201 @item self
1202 An estimate of the amount of time spent in @code{report} itself when it was
1203 called from @code{main}.
1204
1205 @item children
1206 An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1207 when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1208
1209 The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1210 of the amount of time spent within calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1211
1212 @item called
1213 Two numbers: the number of times @code{report} was called from @code{main},
1214 followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report} from
1215 all its callers.
1216
1217 @item name and index number
1218 The name of the caller of @code{report} to which this line applies,
1219 followed by the caller's index number.
1220
1221 Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some
1222 options to @code{gprof} request the omission of certain functions.
1223 When a caller has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines
1224 in the entries of the functions it calls.
1225
1226 If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1227 printed between the name and the index number.
1228 @end table
1229
1230 If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a
1231 dummy caller-line is printed which has @samp{<spontaneous>} as the
1232 ``caller's name'' and all other fields blank. This can happen for
1233 signal handlers.
1234 @c What if some calls have determinable callers' names but not all?
1235 @c FIXME - still relevant?
1236
1237 @node Subroutines
1238 @subsection Lines for a Function's Subroutines
1239
1240 A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines---in other
1241 words, a line for each other function that it called. These lines'
1242 fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings
1243 are different because of the difference in context.
1244
1245 For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1246 @code{main}, the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together
1247 with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1248
1249 @smallexample
1250 index % time self children called name
1251 @dots{}
1252 [2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2]
1253 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3]
1254 @end smallexample
1255
1256 Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for @code{main}
1257 calling @code{report}:
1258
1259 @table @code
1260 @item self
1261 An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within @code{report}
1262 when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1263
1264 @item children
1265 An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1266 when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1267
1268 The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1269 of the total time spent in calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1270
1271 @item called
1272 Two numbers, the number of calls to @code{report} from @code{main}
1273 followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report}.
1274 This ratio is used to determine how much of @code{report}'s @code{self}
1275 and @code{children} time gets credited to @code{main}.
1276 @xref{Assumptions, ,Estimating @code{children} Times}.
1277
1278 @item name
1279 The name of the subroutine of @code{main} to which this line applies,
1280 followed by the subroutine's index number.
1281
1282 If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1283 printed between the name and the index number.
1284 @end table
1285
1286 @node Cycles
1287 @subsection How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described
1288 @cindex cycle
1289 @cindex recursion cycle
1290
1291 The graph may be complicated by the presence of @dfn{cycles of
1292 recursion} in the call graph. A cycle exists if a function calls
1293 another function that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to
1294 call) the original function. For example: if @code{a} calls @code{b},
1295 and @code{b} calls @code{a}, then @code{a} and @code{b} form a cycle.
1296
1297 Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions, they
1298 belong to the same cycle. If @code{a} and @code{b} call each other and
1299 @code{b} and @code{c} call each other, all three make one cycle. Note that
1300 even if @code{b} only calls @code{a} if it was not called from @code{a},
1301 @code{gprof} cannot determine this, so @code{a} and @code{b} are still
1302 considered a cycle.
1303
1304 The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers. When a function
1305 belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call graph
1306 it is followed by @samp{<cycle @var{number}>}.
1307
1308 The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the call
1309 graph paradoxical. The ``time spent in children'' of @code{a} should
1310 include the time spent in its subroutine @code{b} and in @code{b}'s
1311 subroutines---but one of @code{b}'s subroutines is @code{a}! How much of
1312 @code{a}'s time should be included in the children of @code{a}, when
1313 @code{a} is indirectly recursive?
1314
1315 The way @code{gprof} resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry
1316 for the cycle as a whole. The primary line of this entry describes the
1317 total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle. The
1318 ``subroutines'' of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle, and
1319 all other functions that were called directly by them. The ``callers'' of
1320 the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called functions in
1321 the cycle.
1322
1323 Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle containing
1324 functions @code{a} and @code{b}. The cycle was entered by a call to
1325 @code{a} from @code{main}; both @code{a} and @code{b} called @code{c}.
1326
1327 @smallexample
1328 index % time self children called name
1329 ----------------------------------------
1330 1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
1331 [3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1332 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
1333 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
1334 ----------------------------------------
1335 3 a <cycle 1> [5]
1336 [4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
1337 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
1338 0 0 3/6 c [6]
1339 ----------------------------------------
1340 1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
1341 2 b <cycle 1> [4]
1342 [5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
1343 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
1344 0 0 3/6 c [6]
1345 ----------------------------------------
1346 @end smallexample
1347
1348 @noindent
1349 (The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry for
1350 @code{main}, which calls @code{a}, and an entry for @code{c}, with callers
1351 @code{a} and @code{b}.)
1352
1353 @smallexample
1354 index % time self children called name
1355 <spontaneous>
1356 [1] 100.00 0 1.93 0 start [1]
1357 0.16 1.77 1/1 main [2]
1358 ----------------------------------------
1359 0.16 1.77 1/1 start [1]
1360 [2] 100.00 0.16 1.77 1 main [2]
1361 1.77 0 1/1 a <cycle 1> [5]
1362 ----------------------------------------
1363 1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
1364 [3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1365 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
1366 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
1367 0 0 6/6 c [6]
1368 ----------------------------------------
1369 3 a <cycle 1> [5]
1370 [4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
1371 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
1372 0 0 3/6 c [6]
1373 ----------------------------------------
1374 1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
1375 2 b <cycle 1> [4]
1376 [5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
1377 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
1378 0 0 3/6 c [6]
1379 ----------------------------------------
1380 0 0 3/6 b <cycle 1> [4]
1381 0 0 3/6 a <cycle 1> [5]
1382 [6] 0.00 0 0 6 c [6]
1383 ----------------------------------------
1384 @end smallexample
1385
1386 The @code{self} field of the cycle's primary line is the total time
1387 spent in all the functions of the cycle. It equals the sum of the
1388 @code{self} fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found
1389 in the entry in the subroutine lines for these functions.
1390
1391 The @code{children} fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine lines
1392 count only subroutines outside the cycle. Even though @code{a} calls
1393 @code{b}, the time spent in those calls to @code{b} is not counted in
1394 @code{a}'s @code{children} time. Thus, we do not encounter the problem of
1395 what to do when the time in those calls to @code{b} includes indirect
1396 recursive calls back to @code{a}.
1397
1398 The @code{children} field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates
1399 the amount of time spent @emph{in the whole cycle}, and its other
1400 subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the cycle.
1401
1402 The @code{called} field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers:
1403 first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by functions
1404 outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were called by
1405 functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the cycle calls
1406 itself). This is a generalization of the usual split into non-recursive and
1407 recursive calls.
1408
1409 The @code{called} field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the
1410 cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions in
1411 the cycle. The total of all these is the second number in the primary line's
1412 @code{called} field.
1413
1414 In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other functions in
1415 the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers. These lines show
1416 how many times each function in the cycle called or was called from each other
1417 function in the cycle. The @code{self} and @code{children} fields in these
1418 lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining meanings for them
1419 when recursion is going on.
1420
1421 @node Line-by-line
1422 @section Line-by-line Profiling
1423
1424 @code{gprof}'s @samp{-l} option causes the program to perform
1425 @dfn{line-by-line} profiling. In this mode, histogram
1426 samples are assigned not to functions, but to individual
1427 lines of source code. This only works with programs compiled with
1428 older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler. Newer versions of @code{gcc}
1429 use a different program - @code{gcov} - to display line-by-line
1430 profiling information.
1431
1432 With the older versions of @code{gcc} the program usually has to be
1433 compiled with a @samp{-g} option, in addition to @samp{-pg}, in order
1434 to generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines.
1435 Note, in much older versions of @code{gcc} the program had to be
1436 compiled with the @samp{-a} command-line option as well.
1437
1438 The flat profile is the most useful output table
1439 in line-by-line mode.
1440 The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since
1441 the current version of @code{gprof} does not propagate
1442 call graph arcs from source code lines to the enclosing function.
1443 The call graph does, however, show each line of code
1444 that called each function, along with a count.
1445
1446 Here is a section of @code{gprof}'s output, without line-by-line profiling.
1447 Note that @code{ct_init} accounted for four histogram hits, and
1448 13327 calls to @code{init_block}.
1449
1450 @smallexample
1451 Flat profile:
1452
1453 Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1454 % cumulative self self total
1455 time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name
1456 30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init
1457
1458
1459 Call graph (explanation follows)
1460
1461
1462 granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1463
1464 index % time self children called name
1465
1466 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long
1467 0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate
1468 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast
1469 0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init
1470 [7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block
1471
1472 @end smallexample
1473
1474 Now let's look at some of @code{gprof}'s output from the same program run,
1475 this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that @code{ct_init}'s
1476 four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code---one hit
1477 occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call graph,
1478 note how
1479 @code{ct_init}'s 13327 calls to @code{init_block} are broken down
1480 into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls
1481 from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387.
1482
1483 @smallexample
1484 Flat profile:
1485
1486 Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1487 % cumulative self
1488 time seconds seconds calls name
1489 7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349)
1490 7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351)
1491 7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382)
1492 7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385)
1493
1494
1495 Call graph (explanation follows)
1496
1497
1498 granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1499
1500 % time self children called name
1501
1502 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
1503 0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763)
1504 0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396)
1505 0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727)
1506 0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686)
1507 0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675)
1508 0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679)
1509 0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730)
1510 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
1511 0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384)
1512 0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385)
1513 0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387)
1514 [6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408)
1515
1516 @end smallexample
1517
1518
1519 @node Annotated Source
1520 @section The Annotated Source Listing
1521
1522 @code{gprof}'s @samp{-A} option triggers an annotated source listing,
1523 which lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the
1524 number of times it was called. You may also need to specify the
1525 @samp{-I} option, if @code{gprof} can't find the source code files.
1526
1527 With older versions of @code{gcc} compiling with @samp{gcc @dots{} -g
1528 -pg -a} augments your program with basic-block counting code, in
1529 addition to function counting code. This enables @code{gprof} to
1530 determine how many times each line of code was executed. With newer
1531 versions of @code{gcc} support for displaying basic-block counts is
1532 provided by the @code{gcov} program.
1533
1534 For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip,
1535 with line numbers added:
1536
1537 @smallexample
1538 1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
1539 2 uch *s;
1540 3 unsigned n;
1541 4 @{
1542 5 register ulg c;
1543 6
1544 7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1545 8
1546 9 if (s == NULL) @{
1547 10 c = 0xffffffffL;
1548 11 @} else @{
1549 12 c = crc;
1550 13 if (n) do @{
1551 14 c = crc_32_tab[...];
1552 15 @} while (--n);
1553 16 @}
1554 17 crc = c;
1555 18 return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
1556 19 @}
1557
1558 @end smallexample
1559
1560 @code{updcrc} has at least five basic-blocks.
1561 One is the function itself. The
1562 @code{if} statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one
1563 for each branch of the @code{if}. A fourth basic-block results from
1564 the @code{if} on line 13, and the contents of the @code{do} loop form
1565 the fifth basic-block. The compiler may also generate additional
1566 basic-blocks to handle various special cases.
1567
1568 A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with
1569 @samp{gprof -l -A}.
1570 The @samp{-x} option is also helpful,
1571 to ensure that each line of code is labeled at least once.
1572 Here is @code{updcrc}'s
1573 annotated source listing for a sample @code{gzip} run:
1574
1575 @smallexample
1576 ulg updcrc(s, n)
1577 uch *s;
1578 unsigned n;
1579 2 ->@{
1580 register ulg c;
1581
1582 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1583
1584 2 -> if (s == NULL) @{
1585 1 -> c = 0xffffffffL;
1586 1 -> @} else @{
1587 1 -> c = crc;
1588 1 -> if (n) do @{
1589 26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...];
1590 26312,1,26311 -> @} while (--n);
1591 @}
1592 2 -> crc = c;
1593 2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
1594 2 ->@}
1595 @end smallexample
1596
1597 In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
1598 each branch of the @code{if} statement. The body of the @code{do}
1599 loop was executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the @code{while}
1600 statement is annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for
1601 each iteration through the loop. One of those times (the last time)
1602 it exited, while it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.
1603
1604 @node Inaccuracy
1605 @chapter Inaccuracy of @code{gprof} Output
1606
1607 @menu
1608 * Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error
1609 * Assumptions:: Estimating children times
1610 @end menu
1611
1612 @node Sampling Error
1613 @section Statistical Sampling Error
1614
1615 The run-time figures that @code{gprof} gives you are based on a sampling
1616 process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function runs
1617 only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling process
1618 ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a pretty good
1619 chance it will actually find that function zero times, or twice.
1620
1621 By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
1622 by counting, not sampling. They are completely accurate and will not
1623 vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single
1624 threaded. In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded
1625 applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are
1626 only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe. (Note:
1627 beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is @emph{not}
1628 thread-safe). @xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
1629
1630 The @dfn{sampling period} that is printed at the beginning of the flat
1631 profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a
1632 run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the sampling
1633 period.
1634
1635 The actual amount of error can be predicted.
1636 For @var{n} samples, the @emph{expected} error
1637 is the square-root of @var{n}. For example,
1638 if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{foo}'s run-time is 1 second,
1639 @var{n} is 100 samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(@var{n}) is 10 samples, so
1640 the expected error in @code{foo}'s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds),
1641 or ten percent of the observed value.
1642 Again, if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{bar}'s run-time is
1643 100 seconds, @var{n} is 10000 samples, sqrt(@var{n}) is 100 samples, so
1644 the expected error in @code{bar}'s run-time is 1 second,
1645 or one percent of the observed value.
1646 It is likely to
1647 vary this much @emph{on the average} from one profiling run to the next.
1648 (@emph{Sometimes} it will vary more.)
1649
1650 This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of information.
1651 If the program's @emph{total} run-time is large, a small run-time for one
1652 function does tell you that that function used an insignificant fraction of
1653 the whole program's time. Usually this means it is not worth optimizing.
1654
1655 One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but similar)
1656 input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine the data from
1657 several runs, using the @samp{-s} option of @code{gprof}. Here is how:
1658
1659 @enumerate
1660 @item
1661 Run your program once.
1662
1663 @item
1664 Issue the command @samp{mv gmon.out gmon.sum}.
1665
1666 @item
1667 Run your program again, the same as before.
1668
1669 @item
1670 Merge the new data in @file{gmon.out} into @file{gmon.sum} with this command:
1671
1672 @example
1673 gprof -s @var{executable-file} gmon.out gmon.sum
1674 @end example
1675
1676 @item
1677 Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
1678
1679 @item
1680 Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
1681
1682 @example
1683 gprof @var{executable-file} gmon.sum > @var{output-file}
1684 @end example
1685 @end enumerate
1686
1687 @node Assumptions
1688 @section Estimating @code{children} Times
1689
1690 Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates---for example, the
1691 @code{children} time values and all the time figures in caller and
1692 subroutine lines.
1693
1694 There is no direct information about these measurements in the profile
1695 data itself. Instead, @code{gprof} estimates them by making an assumption
1696 about your program that might or might not be true.
1697
1698 The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to any
1699 function @code{foo} is not correlated with who called @code{foo}. If
1700 @code{foo} used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to @code{foo} came
1701 from @code{a}, then @code{foo} contributes 2 seconds to @code{a}'s
1702 @code{children} time, by assumption.
1703
1704 This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is far
1705 from true. Suppose that @code{foo} returns very quickly when its argument
1706 is zero; suppose that @code{a} always passes zero as an argument, while
1707 other callers of @code{foo} pass other arguments. In this program, all the
1708 time spent in @code{foo} is in the calls from callers other than @code{a}.
1709 But @code{gprof} has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and
1710 incorrectly charge 2 seconds of time in @code{foo} to the children of
1711 @code{a}.
1712
1713 @c FIXME - has this been fixed?
1714 We hope some day to put more complete data into @file{gmon.out}, so that
1715 this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how. For the
1716 novice, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading.
1717
1718 @node How do I?
1719 @chapter Answers to Common Questions
1720
1721 @table @asis
1722 @item How can I get more exact information about hot spots in my program?
1723
1724 Looking at the per-line call counts only tells part of the story.
1725 Because @code{gprof} can only report call times and counts by function,
1726 the best way to get finer-grained information on where the program
1727 is spending its time is to re-factor large functions into sequences
1728 of calls to smaller ones. Beware however that this can introduce
1729 artificial hot spots since compiling with @samp{-pg} adds a significant
1730 overhead to function calls. An alternative solution is to use a
1731 non-intrusive profiler, e.g.@: oprofile.
1732
1733 @item How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times?
1734
1735 Use the @code{gcov} program.
1736
1737 @item How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function?
1738
1739 Use @samp{gprof -l} and lookup the function in the call graph.
1740 The callers will be broken down by function and line number.
1741
1742 @item How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second?
1743
1744 Try using a shell script like this one:
1745
1746 @example
1747 for i in `seq 1 100`; do
1748 fastprog
1749 mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i
1750 done
1751
1752 gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.*
1753
1754 gprof fastprog gmon.sum
1755 @end example
1756
1757 If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts
1758 will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e., a function called once in
1759 each run will appear with a call count of 100).
1760
1761 @end table
1762
1763 @node Incompatibilities
1764 @chapter Incompatibilities with Unix @code{gprof}
1765
1766 @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Berkeley Unix @code{gprof} use the same data
1767 file @file{gmon.out}, and provide essentially the same information. But
1768 there are a few differences.
1769
1770 @itemize @bullet
1771 @item
1772 @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new, generalized file format with support
1773 for basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms. A magic
1774 cookie and version number allows @code{gprof} to easily identify
1775 new style files. Old BSD-style files can still be read.
1776 @xref{File Format, ,Profiling Data File Format}.
1777
1778 @item
1779 For a recursive function, Unix @code{gprof} lists the function as a
1780 parent and as a child, with a @code{calls} field that lists the number
1781 of recursive calls. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} omits these lines and puts
1782 the number of recursive calls in the primary line.
1783
1784 @item
1785 When a function is suppressed from the call graph with @samp{-e}, @sc{gnu}
1786 @code{gprof} still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it.
1787
1788 @item
1789 @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} accepts the @samp{-k} with its argument
1790 in the form @samp{from/to}, instead of @samp{from to}.
1791
1792 @item
1793 In the annotated source listing,
1794 if there are multiple basic blocks on the same line,
1795 @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} prints all of their counts, separated by commas.
1796
1797 @ignore - it does this now
1798 @item
1799 The function names printed in @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} output do not include
1800 the leading underscores that are added internally to the front of all
1801 C identifiers on many operating systems.
1802 @end ignore
1803
1804 @item
1805 The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different. @sc{gnu}
1806 @code{gprof} prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the
1807 tables without skipping the blurbs.
1808 @end itemize
1809
1810 @node Details
1811 @chapter Details of Profiling
1812
1813 @menu
1814 * Implementation:: How a program collects profiling information
1815 * File Format:: Format of @samp{gmon.out} files
1816 * Internals:: @code{gprof}'s internal operation
1817 * Debugging:: Using @code{gprof}'s @samp{-d} option
1818 @end menu
1819
1820 @node Implementation
1821 @section Implementation of Profiling
1822
1823 Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is compiled
1824 so that when it is called, it will stash away some information about where
1825 it was called from. From this, the profiler can figure out what function
1826 called it, and can count how many times it was called. This change is made
1827 by the compiler when your program is compiled with the @samp{-pg} option,
1828 which causes every function to call @code{mcount}
1829 (or @code{_mcount}, or @code{__mcount}, depending on the OS and compiler)
1830 as one of its first operations.
1831
1832 The @code{mcount} routine, included in the profiling library,
1833 is responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table
1834 both its parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent. This is
1835 typically done by examining the stack frame to find both
1836 the address of the child, and the return address in the original parent.
1837 Since this is a very machine-dependent operation, @code{mcount}
1838 itself is typically a short assembly-language stub routine
1839 that extracts the required
1840 information, and then calls @code{__mcount_internal}
1841 (a normal C function) with two arguments---@code{frompc} and @code{selfpc}.
1842 @code{__mcount_internal} is responsible for maintaining
1843 the in-memory call graph, which records @code{frompc}, @code{selfpc},
1844 and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed.
1845
1846 GCC Version 2 provides a magical function (@code{__builtin_return_address}),
1847 which allows a generic @code{mcount} function to extract the
1848 required information from the stack frame. However, on some
1849 architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be
1850 very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version
1851 of @code{mcount} is used for performance reasons.
1852
1853 Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by using a
1854 special version of the C library. The programs in it are the same as in
1855 the usual C library, but they were compiled with @samp{-pg}. If you
1856 link your program with @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg}, it automatically uses the
1857 profiling version of the library.
1858
1859 Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping a
1860 histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and then.
1861 Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per second of
1862 run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to system.
1863
1864 This is done is one of two ways. Most UNIX-like operating systems
1865 provide a @code{profil()} system call, which registers a memory
1866 array with the kernel, along with a scale
1867 factor that determines how the program's address space maps
1868 into the array.
1869 Typical scaling values cause every 2 to 8 bytes of address space
1870 to map into a single array slot.
1871 On every tick of the system clock
1872 (assuming the profiled program is running), the value of the
1873 program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in
1874 the memory array is incremented. Since this is done in the kernel,
1875 which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock
1876 interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required.
1877
1878 However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and earlier),
1879 do not provide a @code{profil()} system call. On such a system,
1880 arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver
1881 a signal to the process (typically via @code{setitimer()}),
1882 which then performs the same operation of examining the
1883 program counter and incrementing a slot in the memory array.
1884 Since this method requires a signal to be delivered to
1885 user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably
1886 more overhead than kernel-based profiling. Also, due to the
1887 added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is
1888 less accurate as well.
1889
1890 A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and
1891 either calls @code{profil()} or sets up
1892 a clock signal handler.
1893 This routine (@code{monstartup}) can be invoked in several ways.
1894 On Linux systems, a special profiling startup file @code{gcrt0.o},
1895 which invokes @code{monstartup} before @code{main},
1896 is used instead of the default @code{crt0.o}.
1897 Use of this special startup file is one of the effects
1898 of using @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg} to link.
1899 On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used.
1900 Rather, the @code{mcount} routine, when it is invoked for
1901 the first time (typically when @code{main} is called),
1902 calls @code{monstartup}.
1903
1904 If the compiler's @samp{-a} option was used, basic-block counting
1905 is also enabled. Each object file is then compiled with a static array
1906 of counts, initially zero.
1907 In the executable code, every time a new basic-block begins
1908 (i.e., when an @code{if} statement appears), an extra instruction
1909 is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the array.
1910 At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded
1911 the starting address of each basic-block. Taken together,
1912 the two arrays record the starting address of every basic-block,
1913 along with the number of times it was executed.
1914
1915 The profiling library also includes a function (@code{mcleanup}) which is
1916 typically registered using @code{atexit()} to be called as the
1917 program exits, and is responsible for writing the file @file{gmon.out}.
1918 Profiling is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram
1919 is written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts.
1920
1921 The output from @code{gprof} gives no indication of parts of your program that
1922 are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth. This is because samples of the
1923 program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run time.
1924 Therefore, the
1925 time measurements in @code{gprof} output say nothing about time that your
1926 program was not running. For example, a part of the program that creates
1927 so much data that it cannot all fit in physical memory at once may run very
1928 slowly due to thrashing, but @code{gprof} will say it uses little time. On
1929 the other hand, sampling by run time has the advantage that the amount of
1930 load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get.
1931
1932 @node File Format
1933 @section Profiling Data File Format
1934
1935 The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a
1936 magic cookie that allows one to check whether a data file really is a
1937 @code{gprof} file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus
1938 rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof}
1939 uses a new file format that provides these features. For backward
1940 compatibility, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} continues to support the old BSD-derived
1941 format, but not all features are supported with it. For example,
1942 basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file
1943 format.
1944
1945 The new file format is defined in header file @file{gmon_out.h}. It
1946 consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number,
1947 as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions. All data
1948 in a profile data file is in the native format of the target for which
1949 the profile was collected. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} adapts automatically
1950 to the byte-order in use.
1951
1952 In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of
1953 records. Currently, there are three different record types: histogram
1954 records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count
1955 records. Each file can contain any number of each record type. When
1956 reading a file, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} will ensure records of the same type are
1957 compatible with each other and compute the union of all records. For
1958 example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum
1959 of all execution counts for each basic-block.
1960
1961 @subsection Histogram Records
1962
1963 Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of
1964 bins. The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram
1965 spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD
1966 format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the
1967 profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts
1968 represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate. The
1969 physical dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15
1970 characters and a single character abbreviation. For example, a
1971 histogram representing real-time would specify the long name as
1972 ``seconds'' and the abbreviation as ``s''. This feature is useful for
1973 architectures that support performance monitor hardware (which,
1974 fortunately, is becoming increasingly common). For example, under DEC
1975 OSF/1, the ``uprofile'' command can be used to produce a histogram of,
1976 say, instruction cache misses. In this case, the dimension in the
1977 histogram header could be set to ``i-cache misses'' and the abbreviation
1978 could be set to ``1'' (because it is simply a count, not a physical
1979 dimension). Also, the profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in
1980 this case.
1981
1982 Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal
1983 amount of text-space. For example, if the text-segment is one
1984 thousand bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each
1985 bin represents one hundred bytes.
1986
1987
1988 @subsection Call-Graph Records
1989
1990 Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in
1991 the BSD-derived file format. It consists of an arc in the call graph
1992 and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed
1993 during program execution. Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses:
1994 the first must be within caller's function and the second must be
1995 within the callee's function. When performing profiling at the
1996 function level, these addresses can point anywhere within the
1997 respective function. However, when profiling at the line-level, it is
1998 better if the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as
1999 possible. This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to
2000 identify exactly which line of source code performed calls to a
2001 function.
2002
2003 @subsection Basic-Block Execution Count Records
2004
2005 Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a
2006 sequence of address/count pairs. The header simply specifies the
2007 length of the sequence. In an address/count pair, the address
2008 identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times
2009 that basic-block was executed. Any address within the basic-address can
2010 be used.
2011
2012 @node Internals
2013 @section @code{gprof}'s Internal Operation
2014
2015 Like most programs, @code{gprof} begins by processing its options.
2016 During this stage, it may building its symspec list
2017 (@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_add}), if
2018 options are specified which use symspecs.
2019 @code{gprof} maintains a single linked list of symspecs,
2020 which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables,
2021 organized into six include/exclude pairs---one
2022 pair each for the flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT),
2023 the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS),
2024 printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH),
2025 timing propagation in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME),
2026 the annotated source listing (INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO),
2027 and the execution count listing (INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC).
2028
2029 After option processing, @code{gprof} finishes
2030 building the symspec list by adding all the symspecs in
2031 @code{default_excluded_list} to the exclude lists
2032 EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is specified,
2033 EXCL_FLAT as well.
2034 These default excludes are not added to EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC.
2035
2036 Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file,
2037 verify that it is an object file,
2038 and read its symbol table (@code{core.c:@-core_init}),
2039 using @code{bfd_canonicalize_symtab} after mallocing
2040 an appropriately sized array of symbols. At this point,
2041 function mappings are read (if the @samp{--file-ordering} option
2042 has been specified), and the core text space is read into
2043 memory (if the @samp{-c} option was given).
2044
2045 @code{gprof}'s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures,
2046 is now built.
2047 This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending
2048 on whether line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option) has been
2049 enabled.
2050 For normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned.
2051 For line-by-line profiling, every
2052 text space address is examined, and a new symbol table entry
2053 gets created every time the line number changes.
2054 In either case, two passes are made through the symbol
2055 table---one to count the size of the symbol table required,
2056 and the other to actually read the symbols. In between the
2057 two passes, a single array of type @code{Sym} is created of
2058 the appropriate length.
2059 Finally, @code{symtab.c:@-symtab_finalize}
2060 is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries
2061 (entries with the same memory address).
2062
2063 The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons.
2064 First, the @code{qsort} library function (which sorts an array)
2065 will be used to sort the symbol table.
2066 Also, the symbol lookup routine (@code{symtab.c:@-sym_lookup}),
2067 which finds symbols
2068 based on memory address, uses a binary search algorithm
2069 which requires the symbol table to be a sorted array.
2070 Function symbols are indicated with an @code{is_func} flag.
2071 Line number symbols have no special flags set.
2072 Additionally, a symbol can have an @code{is_static} flag
2073 to indicate that it is a local symbol.
2074
2075 With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated
2076 into Syms (@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_parse}). Remember that a single
2077 symspec can match multiple symbols.
2078 An array of symbol tables
2079 (@code{syms}) is created, each entry of which is a symbol table
2080 of Syms to be included or excluded from a particular listing.
2081 The master symbol table and the symspecs are examined by nested
2082 loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is inserted
2083 into the appropriate syms table. This is done twice, once to
2084 count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build
2085 the tables, which have been malloced between passes.
2086 From now on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include
2087 or exclude symspec list, @code{gprof} simply uses its
2088 standard symbol lookup routine on the appropriate table
2089 in the @code{syms} array.
2090
2091 Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read
2092 (@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_read}),
2093 first by checking for a new-style @samp{gmon.out} header,
2094 then assuming this is an old-style BSD @samp{gmon.out}
2095 if the magic number test failed.
2096
2097 New-style histogram records are read by @code{hist.c:@-hist_read_rec}.
2098 For the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold
2099 all the bins, and read them in.
2100 When multiple profile data files (or files with multiple histogram
2101 records) are read, the memory ranges of each pair of histogram records
2102 must be either equal, or non-overlapping. For each pair of histogram
2103 records, the resolution (memory region size divided by the number of
2104 bins) must be the same. The time unit must be the same for all
2105 histogram records. If the above containts are met, all histograms
2106 for the same memory range are merged.
2107
2108 As each call graph record is read (@code{call_graph.c:@-cg_read_rec}),
2109 the parent and child addresses
2110 are matched to symbol table entries, and a call graph arc is
2111 created by @code{cg_arcs.c:@-arc_add}, unless the arc fails a symspec
2112 check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS. As each arc is added,
2113 a linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's
2114 parent arcs.
2115 Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are
2116 incremented by the record's call count.
2117
2118 Basic-block records are read (@code{basic_blocks.c:@-bb_read_rec}),
2119 but only if line-by-line profiling has been selected.
2120 Each basic-block address is matched to a corresponding line
2121 symbol in the symbol table, and an entry made in the symbol's
2122 bb_addr and bb_calls arrays. Again, if multiple basic-block
2123 records are present for the same address, the call counts
2124 are cumulative.
2125
2126 A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_write}).
2127
2128 If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols
2129 (@code{hist.c:@-hist_assign_samples}) by iterating over all the sample
2130 bins and assigning them to symbols. Since the symbol table
2131 is sorted in order of ascending memory addresses, we can
2132 simple follow along in the symbol table as we make our pass
2133 over the sample bins.
2134 This step includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT.
2135 Depending on the histogram
2136 scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols,
2137 in which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated
2138 to each symbol, proportional to the degree of overlap.
2139 This effect is rare for normal profiling, but overlaps
2140 are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can
2141 cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half
2142 a hit, for example.
2143
2144 If call graph data is present, @code{cg_arcs.c:@-cg_assemble} is called.
2145 First, if @samp{-c} was specified, a machine-dependent
2146 routine (@code{find_call}) scans through each symbol's machine code,
2147 looking for subroutine call instructions, and adding them
2148 to the call graph with a zero call count.
2149 A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering
2150 all the symbols (@code{cg_dfn.c:@-cg_dfn}), so that
2151 children are always numbered less than their parents,
2152 then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and sorting it into
2153 numerical order, which is reverse topological
2154 order (children appear before parents).
2155 Cycles are also detected at this point, all members
2156 of which are assigned the same topological number.
2157 Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers.
2158 The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children),
2159 computes the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent
2160 and a print flag.
2161 The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH,
2162 with a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property
2163 being propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear
2164 in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH.
2165 A second pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually
2166 propagates the timings along the call graph, subject
2167 to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME.
2168 With the print flag, fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol
2169 structures, the topological sort array is now discarded, and a
2170 new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted by propagated time.
2171
2172 Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now fairly
2173 straightforward. The call graph (@code{cg_print.c:@-cg_print}) and
2174 flat profile (@code{hist.c:@-hist_print}) are regurgitations of values
2175 already computed. The annotated source listing
2176 (@code{basic_blocks.c:@-print_annotated_source}) uses basic-block
2177 information, if present, to label each line of code with call counts,
2178 otherwise only the function call counts are presented.
2179
2180 The function ordering code is marginally well documented
2181 in the source code itself (@code{cg_print.c}). Basically,
2182 the functions with the most use and the most parents are
2183 placed first, followed by other functions with the most use,
2184 followed by lower use functions, followed by unused functions
2185 at the end.
2186
2187 @node Debugging
2188 @section Debugging @code{gprof}
2189
2190 If @code{gprof} was compiled with debugging enabled,
2191 the @samp{-d} option triggers debugging output
2192 (to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its operation.
2193 The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of the following
2194 options:
2195
2196 @table @asis
2197 @item 2 - Topological sort
2198 Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis
2199 @item 4 - Cycles
2200 Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads
2201 @item 16 - Tallying
2202 As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how
2203 the total calls to each function are tallied
2204 @item 32 - Call graph arc sorting
2205 Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph entry
2206 @item 64 - Reading histogram and call graph records
2207 Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each
2208 call graph arc
2209 @item 128 - Symbol table
2210 Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object file.
2211 For line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option), also shows line numbers
2212 being assigned to memory addresses.
2213 @item 256 - Static call graph
2214 Trace operation of @samp{-c} option
2215 @item 512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups
2216 Detail operation of lookup routines
2217 @item 1024 - Call graph propagation
2218 Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph
2219 @item 2048 - Basic-blocks
2220 Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data
2221 (only meaningful with @samp{-l} option)
2222 @item 4096 - Symspecs
2223 Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation
2224 @item 8192 - Annotate source
2225 Tracks operation of @samp{-A} option
2226 @end table
2227
2228 @node GNU Free Documentation License
2229 @appendix GNU Free Documentation License
2230 @include fdl.texi
2231
2232 @bye
2233
2234 NEEDS AN INDEX
2235
2236 -T - "traditional BSD style": How is it different? Should the
2237 differences be documented?
2238
2239 example flat file adds up to 100.01%...
2240
2241 note: time estimates now only go out to one decimal place (0.0), where
2242 they used to extend two (78.67).
This page took 0.078446 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.