From 5ca48ae961d956ce188ff45b2d2c04127874276a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:22:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix: cpp-common/bt2: more specific assertion in
 `CommonVariantWithIntegerSelectorFieldClass` constructor

It seems like we can check that the field class is not only a variant,
but more specifically a variant with integer selector.

Change-Id: Ib062779d957ba1e859247c891027121479ae3adb
Signed-off-by: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/12051
Reviewed-by: Philippe Proulx <eeppeliteloop@gmail.com>
---
 src/cpp-common/bt2/field-class.hpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/cpp-common/bt2/field-class.hpp b/src/cpp-common/bt2/field-class.hpp
index b0420c4f..c6c4d690 100644
--- a/src/cpp-common/bt2/field-class.hpp
+++ b/src/cpp-common/bt2/field-class.hpp
@@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ public:
     explicit CommonVariantWithIntegerSelectorFieldClass(const LibObjPtr libObjPtr) noexcept :
         _ThisCommonVariantWithSelectorFieldClass {libObjPtr}
     {
-        BT_ASSERT_DBG(this->isVariant());
+        BT_ASSERT_DBG(this->isVariantWithIntegerSelector());
     }
 
     template <typename OtherLibObjT>
-- 
2.34.1