rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_initiate_boost() header comment
authorPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:57:54 +0000 (15:57 -0700)
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:42:50 +0000 (07:42 -0700)
Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding
runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing
the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment
accordingly.  This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h

index 15d28febbbd4d4770dad4e7266e4be6cb7043b2a..c47b28bf18ae23c6388f947d08a24be70a5bfb63 100644 (file)
@@ -1197,9 +1197,9 @@ static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg)
  * kthread to start boosting them.  If there is an expedited grace
  * period in progress, it is always time to boost.
  *
- * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases,
- * but irqs remain disabled.  The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal,
- * so we don't need to worry about it going away.
+ * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases.
+ * The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, so we don't need to worry
+ * about it going away.
  */
 static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
 {
This page took 0.027298 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.