arm64: Don't report clear pmds and puds as huge
authorChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:08:31 +0000 (14:08 +0200)
committerCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:29:28 +0000 (14:29 +0100)
The current pmd_huge() and pud_huge() functions simply check if the table
bit is not set and reports the entries as huge in that case.  This is
counter-intuitive as a clear pmd/pud cannot also be a huge pmd/pud, and
it is inconsistent with at least arm and x86.

To prevent others from making the same mistake as me in looking at code
that calls these functions and to fix an issue with KVM on arm64 that
causes memory corruption due to incorrect page reference counting
resulting from this mistake, let's change the behavior.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Fixes: 084bd29810a5 ("ARM64: mm: HugeTLB support.")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c

index 2de9d2e59d96808325829a37bca559c2ddb48a1c..0eeb4f0930a08910b20320fadb765bab25106fc4 100644 (file)
@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long *addr, pte_t *ptep)
 
 int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd)
 {
-       return !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT);
+       return pmd_val(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT);
 }
 
 int pud_huge(pud_t pud)
 {
 #ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
-       return !(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT);
+       return pud_val(pud) && !(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT);
 #else
        return 0;
 #endif
This page took 0.029971 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.